Prince Monolulu
Everything in Moderation
I enjoy a bit of Opera sometimes, can I afford Glyndebourne? No I bloody cannot.
I agree that there should be a cap of around £25 on away tickets, to encourage as many away fans as possible. Having local public transport built into the ticket isn't much help for most away fans, as they have to pay to get here in the first place.
However, I don't think £34 is extortionate when considering the quality of football and the Amex itself. Maybe away fans tickets should be charged at £25 but not have the travel element included.
How is £34 not extortionate for second tier football? I really do struggle to understand how people think that.
You could buy a ticket for ANY club in the Champions League for that price. In fact you could probably buy two for most clubs for £34, and that's far higher quality football.
How is £34 not extortionate for second tier football? I really do struggle to understand how people think that.
You could buy a ticket for ANY club in the Champions League for that price. In fact you could probably buy two for most clubs for £34, and that's far higher quality football.
How is £34 not extortionate for second tier football? I really do struggle to understand how people think that.
You could buy a ticket for ANY club in the Champions League for that price. In fact you could probably buy two for most clubs for £34, and that's far higher quality football.
How is £34 not extortionate for second tier football? I really do struggle to understand how people think that.
You could buy a ticket for ANY club in the Champions League for that price. In fact you could probably buy two for most clubs for £34, and that's far higher quality football.
Why should there be correlation between ticket prices and quality of football ?
I can't even be bothered getting into a discussion if that's your viewpoint.
Yet Bloom is losing millions every year. Premier League clubs could let the fans in for free if they wanted to, but they don't. They want the best players so they can remain where they are, where we want to get to. It's ****ed.
Liverpool v Man Utd
And?
We've drawn 0-0 before.
And?
We've drawn 0-0 before.
Don't see your point. That dire stinkfest was a 'higher quality', more expensive game. All leagues have poor games, but you alluded to higher quality for the money. Really?
We have. We've also had very high scoring games before. So that kind of defeats your 'higher quality' argument. Each match varies in quality and entertainment value, regardless of the level of football.
We have. We've also had very high scoring games before. So that kind of defeats your 'higher quality' argument. Each match varies in quality and entertainment value, regardless of the level of football.
So you honestly don't think Man Utd and Liverpool is 'higher quality'?
Why aren't we at the top end of the Premier League then? If our games are 'higher quality'. Those teams have better players, and you should pay more to watch them.
You don't pay more to watch a film made by a bloke with an Iphone 4, as opposed to going to an Imax cinema. You don't pay more to watch Horse's race at Plumpton than you do at Cheltenham on Gold Cup day. I really struggle to see why our prices should be higher than ENGLISH clubs charge for a Champions League match.