Red Cross giving first aid lessons to taliban

[Husty]

It's a complete lose/lose situation for the Red Cross isn't it? Don't aid the injured Taliban & they're seen as not being impartial; help 'em & they're collaborating with the enemy. Funny old game, war.

It's not a new thing, it has happened in every major war, most sensible people understand what the charity does and why it does, you just come across the occasional windowlicker like Bushy who thought they were only there to help the good guys.

 

[Don Quixote]

They help the injured, no matter who they are. They help anyone. It has always been the same...

 

[User removed 4]

Any one who actually donates to these charities would understand that the Red Cross are neutral and therefore treat both sides, the red cross were treating nazis in world war 2 so I assume we shouldn't support them for that either : Thank f*** the majority of the country isn't as thick or bigoted as you ey bushy because then we would be begging the taliban to come and rule over us.

Ive seen a lot of your posts and you clearly have an over inflated sense of your own intellect, i'm quite frankly surprised you won a scholarship to hurst as a lot of your posts reflect a world view and knowledge of the geo political situation that would shame a five year old, get some life experience outside of hurstpierpoint and secondary school before you start gobbing off about things, eh sonny ?

 

[Da Man Clay]

Go and f*** yourself you conceited little c*nt, i was posting it because these people will be colecting on the streets of the uk , and i bet they wont be advertising the fact that they are treating the people trying to kill our soldiers , nothing to do with their neutrality, c*nt.

It's EVERYTHING to do with their neturality - they're either netural and treat both sides or just treat our boys and are seen as no longer being impartial. They cannot be selective over which injured people they treat. That's the thing with being a worldwide netural service.

 

[Husty]

Ive seen a lot of your posts and you clearly have an over inflated sense of your own intellect, i'm quite frankly surprised you won a scholarship to hurst as a lot of your posts reflect a world view and knowledge of the geo political situation that would shame a five year old, get some life experience outside of hurstpierpoint and secondary school before you start gobbing off about things, eh sonny ?

Your right, im thick as a fiddle so can you please explain to me why the red cross helping the taliban is a bad thing?

 

[The Wizard]

Its not like they are teaching them how to make bombs is it, all they are doing is teaching them some first aid which will save lives, no big deal in my opinion.

 

[User removed 4]

Your right, im thick as a fiddle so can you please explain to me why the red cross helping the taliban is a bad thing?

its fit as a fiddle , or thick as a five bar gate, never mind it just reflects the fact you dont really know much about life outside of hurstpierpoint, as ive already stated, i wasnt commenting on their neutrality just the fact that people might want tyo reconsider giving money to an organisation that treats people who are killing our troops , i certainly wont be , you might want to in some misguided sixth form common room type protest.

 

[User removed 4]

Its not like they are teaching them how to make bombs is it, all they are doing is teaching them some first aid which will save lives, no big deal in my opinion.

yes, save lives so they can return to the frontline and carry on trying to kill our blokes , great , no big deal then

 

[The Wizard]

yes, save lives so they can return to the frontline and carry on trying to kill our blokes , great , no big deal then

I'm not saying its right but as has already been said, the red cross are impartial so I guess they are in a difficult position.

 

[Barrel of Fun]

Simple question Bushy - Do you think it would be safe for the Red Cross to operate and supply much needed aid if they were to take support a particular side?

 

[BigGully]

Any one who actually donates to these charities would understand that the Red Cross are neutral and therefore treat both sides, the red cross were treating nazis in world war 2 so I assume we shouldn't support them for that either : Thank f*** the majority of the country isn't as thick or bigoted as you ey bushy because then we would be begging the taliban to come and rule over us.

I would think medics in all wars treat casualties, thats fine and seems a kind act of humanity.

But to raise much of their money from the Western World and then TRAIN the terrorist to become more effective and resilient whilst fighting and killing our troops is a warped sense of righteousness.

I would suspect they have so much wealth from their collections they dont know what to use it for.

 

[User removed 4]

Simple question Bushy - Do you think it would be safe for the Red Cross to operate and supply much needed aid if they were to take support a particular side?

for about the 3rd time its not about their neutrality, simple question BOF, would you donate to them knowing that the money you donated could be used to train a taliban to save his mates life who could then go on to kill a british soldier ?

 

[BigGully]

for about the 3rd time its not about their neutrality, simple question BOF, would you donate to them knowing that the money you donated could be used to train a taliban to save his mates life who could then go on to kill a british soldier ?

Simple question really.

 

[Hotchilidog]

for about the 3rd time its not about their neutrality, simple question BOF, would you donate to them knowing that the money you donated could be used to train a taliban to save his mates life who could then go on to kill a british soldier ?

What's the difference between that and paying taxes that have financed the deaths of thousands of innocent people and the displacement of millions of others.

 

[BigGully]

What's the difference between that and paying taxes that have financed the deaths of thousands of innocent people and the displacement of millions of others.

We have been asked that question and answered it, its called an election.

Now back to the question you have not yet answered ??

 

[User removed 4]

What's the difference between that and paying taxes that have financed the deaths of thousands of innocent people and the displacement of millions of others.

loyalty and solidarity to your own ?
i guess you dont have much of that .

 

[Juan Albion]

for about the 3rd time its not about their neutrality, simple question BOF, would you donate to them knowing that the money you donated could be used to train a taliban to save his mates life who could then go on to kill a british soldier ?

How much of the few bob you might put in their tin is actually spent treating the Taliban, then, bushy? Let's err on the side of caution and say it is about 1/10000th (probably a huge lot less, but we'll start there to keep my point understandable). So if you don't give a quid, the people you are depriving most are the 9999/10000ths of all the people the Red Cross treats/serves. So I think I could live with myself if I still bung a few bob in the bucket.

 

[User removed 4]

How much of the few bob you might put in their tin is actually spent treating the Taliban, then, bushy? Let's err on the side of caution and say it is about 1/10000th (probably a huge lot less, but we'll start there to keep my point understandable). So if you don't give a quid, the people you are depriving most are the 9999/10000ths of all the the Red Cross treats/serves. So I think I could live with myself if I still bung a few bob in the bucket.

fine , you do that then.

 

[34064 Fighter Command]

Since British Army Medics already treat Iraqi insurgents and Taliban fighters why are these numpties getting so hot under the collar.

 

[34064 Fighter Command]

loyalty and solidarity to your own ?
i guess you dont have much of that .

This would be the same British Army that shot their own people dead in Londonderry.....