Kosh
'The' Yaztromo
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Chelsea clearly opting for the ‘complete dick heads policy.’
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Football] Potter [NOT] at Chelsea
- Thread starter Bozza
- Start date
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Chelsea clearly opting for the ‘complete dick heads policy.’
Cheeky Monkey
Well-known member
- Jul 17, 2003
- 23,057
He didn’t need much time to make a decision to jump ship. Maybe he should have thought that through. Zero sympathy.
Gabbafella
Well-known member
- Aug 22, 2012
- 4,722
Chelsea looking much better in the last 10mins, looking the most likely to score now.
It's a really dirty feeling wanting palace to score.
It's a really dirty feeling wanting palace to score.
- May 8, 2018
- 9,329
Grow that Barnet and he will be Leeds through and through in 3 years if the hype doesn’t live upWill fit in well with the neck tattoos
There's no bad result for me on this game
If you're a professional football team and you can't beat a side with Ayew up front and Tomkins at the back then I'm sorry but you deserve all the pelters coming your way.
JamesAndTheGiantHead
Well-known member
He was great in This Country
Gabbafella
Well-known member
- Aug 22, 2012
- 4,722
0-0 at half time. Hope it stays that way.
Although it would be nice to laugh at another Chelsea defeat, don't really want palace picking up 3 points.
Although it would be nice to laugh at another Chelsea defeat, don't really want palace picking up 3 points.
- Oct 20, 2022
- 4,894
Nor me particularly- and edited the emoji to reflect that better - My original ‘
’ was really aimed at the post by Zebedee to which I was replying, tongue in cheek for his benefit rather than having a personal pop at Potter per se. Ever since GP left, I have not only refrained from denigrating his character but nor have I been negatively and unduly revisionist about his tenure at Brighton (unlike the majority of the more vocal NSCers on numerous threads!) - however, you must admit it’s a lesson in contrast to the ‘easy life’ he claimed to have had at Brighton and the not so easy life it’s turned out to be managing a bunch of entitled and disparate prima donnas at a top tier, ‘Big 6’ club with a long tradition of seeking and buying instant gratification. Looking a bit like a square peg in a round hole to me at the moment but that’s as far as I go. IMO we got the best silver lining one could hope for from him leaving and are doing brilliantly under RDZ - for that I make no apology 
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 70,340
Would settle for 0-0, if only for the #potterout shits and giggles
A true quandary isn't it with almost no downsides?
Even if Palace win it won't be enough to bring the trolls out considering our success this weekend.
f*** him...
i see Chelsea have signed a striker on a 8 and a half year deal. I can’t recall any player having such a long contract before. Anyone else find this a bit odd?
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 70,340
I guess we missed a trick there with DJ Locadia. Gah!
Circa £10m hit on the P&L each year compared to £20m plus on a four year contract.
portslade seagull
Well-known member
Think I read somewhere that it allows them to spread the transfer fee over 8yrs so not affecting FFP with a big hit
It’s said to be their strategy now, mainly to protect investment. Cucurella was 6 years I think
The possible downside is that it generates a larger loss if the player gets sold cheaply in two or three years.