Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Chelsea clearly opting for the ‘complete dick heads policy.’
Will fit in well with the neck tattoos

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Chelsea clearly opting for the ‘complete dick heads policy.’
Grow that Barnet and he will be Leeds through and through in 3 years if the hype doesn’t live upWill fit in well with the neck tattoos![]()
There's no bad result for me on this gameChelsea looking much better in the last 10mins, looking the most likely to score now.
It's a really dirty feeling wanting palace to score.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Chelsea clearly opting for the ‘complete dick heads policy.’
Nor me particularly- and edited the emoji to reflect that better - My original ‘I get no pleasure from seeing that change
Would settle for 0-0, if only for the #potterout shits and giggles0-0 at half time. Hope it stays that way.
Although it would be nice to laugh at another Chelsea defeat, don't really want palace picking up 3 points.
A true quandary isn't it with almost no downsides?0-0 at half time. Hope it stays that way.
Although it would be nice to laugh at another Chelsea defeat, don't really want palace picking up 3 points.
f*** him...He didn’t need much time to make a decision to jump ship. Maybe he should have thought that through. Zero sympathy.
I guess we missed a trick there with DJ Locadia. Gah!i see Chelsea have signed a striker on a 8 and a half year deal. I can’t recall any player having such a long contract before. Anyone else find this a bit odd?
Circa £10m hit on the P&L each year compared to £20m plus on a four year contract.i see Chelsea have signed a striker on a 8 and a half year deal. I can’t recall any player having such a long contract before. Anyone else find this a bit odd?
Think I read somewhere that it allows them to spread the transfer fee over 8yrs so not affecting FFP with a big hiti see Chelsea have signed a striker on a 8 and a half year deal. I can’t recall any player having such a long contract before. Anyone else find this a bit odd?
It’s said to be their strategy now, mainly to protect investment. Cucurella was 6 years I thinki see Chelsea have signed a striker on a 8 and a half year deal. I can’t recall any player having such a long contract before. Anyone else find this a bit odd?
The possible downside is that it generates a larger loss if the player gets sold cheaply in two or three years.It’s said to be their strategy now, mainly to protect investment. Cucurella was 6 years I think
They have left the leading 1 off that bid.So apparently the next player is a 75 million bid for caicedo
That would be over 500 million spent in 2 windows and bids going in for a rb still.
Has FFP just completely given up? Or are they still inside it somehow.
The wage bill must be massive.
I imagine there will be a fire sale in the summer.