West Upper Seagull
Well-known member
I’m struggling to get my head around what has been reported on Sky about Potter’s pay off:
”Chelsea would have had to pay an estimated £50m after sacking Graham Potter, but have reached an agreement which avoids a world-record fee.”
If he’s entitled to c.£50m because of the 5 year contract they gave him, why would he accept less ?
”Chelsea would have had to pay an estimated £50m after sacking Graham Potter, but have reached an agreement which avoids a world-record fee.”
If he’s entitled to c.£50m because of the 5 year contract they gave him, why would he accept less ?