Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
FPC Snipers Are Off Again?!
- Thread starter seagull inde away stand
- Start date
Storer68
New member
Arthur... just F88k off with these lies and innuedos.
MP is not "creaming off a wage" - he is earning a legitimate renumeration for his labour.
JJ McClure
Go Jags
I think it was "where is the floodlights?"
Arthur
Well-known member
Now we're getting places, where I have I said I am stating FACT?
steward 433
Back and better
Arthur
Well-known member
What is a lie in those statements?
Perry is getting paid by the club and the club is losing money hand over fist!
Arthur - were you ignored as a kid or something? The way you are persisting here looks awfully like a cry for attention.
Arthur
Well-known member
Then why spout all this drivel?
If it's drivel to you then you know where to file it.
Just trying to prepare a few people for the inevitable disappointment that will occur.
Arthur
Well-known member
I can't win!
On one hand I'm getting ****ed off for not answering questions and now you are accusing me of craving attention!
Evidence = FACT.
Only FACTS are used as evidence.
As said before, you are offering an opinion. An opinion which is based on incorrect facts.
steward 433
Back and better
And why exactly is it inevitable?
I have seen from inside the club exactly how the plans are progressing and i am very confident
portlock seagull
Why? Why us?
- Jul 28, 2003
- 17,386
Arthur, can I just step in as an impartial observer and say 'you're talking absolute bollocks mate, just leave it'?
The Large One
Who's Next?
Oh, for f*** sake, it's like dealing with an errant child.
'Being pushed around by a Parish Council' (something which Lord Bracknell, someone who knows far more about planning than you evidently do, told you clearly and concisely was not the case - do keep up) is NOT an answer to 'Which of the delays were the fault of the club?' Or rather, it's an irrelevant, largely rubbish answer.
Even if it were true, then the fault would still be laid at the door of Falmer Parish Council, not the club.
So, here we go again - which of the delays were the fault of the club? Come on, it's not a hard question.
Caveman
Well-known member
- Jul 14, 2003
- 9,926
I don't know the question, but the answer is "floodlights".
That's the whole nub of his argument/opinion. I think he thinks Martin Perry was in some sort of collusion with FPC (although how he managed to get John Prescott to call it in for a public inquiry in 2002 is beyond me, and to persuade LDC to join in) just to prolong his employment.
You'd have thought that the other directors (who have also put in their money) would have been suspicious by now, wouldn't you?
Lord Bracknell
On fire
Which of the delays in completing the stadium project could have been avoided if the football club had done something different?
I'd be happy if Arthur could identify just ONE delay that could have been avoided by the Club doing something different.
"We were pushed around by a parish council" is not the answer, but it's the ONLY attempt at an answer that Arthur has made so far.
The Large One
Who's Next?
The irony being that I see Arthur as an apologist for Falmer Parish Council, actually believing that what they have written recently has any merit in plannig terms.
Publius Ovidius
Well-known member
the question was.....why are there no floodlights ( or any lights) on the pictures of the stadium that Arthur ( Nick rowe) recons will never happen as Perry is incompetant?
I think
The Large One
Who's Next?
Apres-moi, les deluge lumieres.*
*Yeah I know it's a literal translation, but SO WHAT?
TSB
Captain Hindsight
I believe Arthur to be Mr Forfars. Follows the club, so he knows a little bit, but hates the thought of the stadium anywhere near his person.
I'm convinced.
ALSO: Does he post on ANY threads apart from about the stadium!?!?
I'm convinced.
ALSO: Does he post on ANY threads apart from about the stadium!?!?