GOM
living vicariously
Don't bother watching the program so full of untruths and opinions it will make you angry. e.g. the question "if you're in the middle of nowhere and you break down, what are you going to do?" - what the hell has that got to do with an EV ?I don't see what the problem is – technology evolves all the time and I know for a fact that the AA now has a healthy fleet of vans to help people who run out of charge at the roadside, alongside the ones that help people sort their ICE cars out when they misfuel. Having spoken to Edmund King, the AA's president (who has a Porsche Taycan EV as his daily driver), a few times over the years, he doesn't seemed phased about the transition to EV and is happy to support it.
There's also the fact that EVs have fewer moving parts and components to go wrong, so there should be fewer breakdowns anyway. Electronics might put spanners in the works, but that's not an issue that just affects EVs.
I work in the industry and meant to watch that programme last night, but I caught the last few minutes and probably won't bother. One of the statements was along the lines of "We were all promised a dream driving experiences, but that might not be the case." WHAT? Who said that and when? Because anyone who is involved with EVs – either manufacturers, journalists, drivers, fleets, whoever – realise that it's a slow process that will have challenges along the way. If that snippet was an insight to the standard of the rest of the programme, I'm out. And don't get me started on Erin bloody Baker!
