Lokki 7
WSU
- Thread starter
- #101
Why does Dawkins feel the need to challenge religion so much? For a lot of people it is a hope that they might get to see lost loved ones again one day or just a guide on how to live a decent life and be a 'good' person. Why does he feel the need to try to shatter peoples hopes that there is something else after death?
You could argue the same about Father Christmas. We tell our kids he is real so they believe in him 100%. They talk about him, write to him, have faith in him and probably pray to him at night. Belief in him gives them hope, pleasure and excitment. Yet as an adult you know that he doesn't exist, would you also argue that children should grow up believing in Father Christmas even though he is a work of fiction? Would their lives really be better?
Dawkins simply puts forward a logical view based on observation and evidence that requires no blind belief. I for one get much more satisfaction from this than I ever did from my narrow minded and inplausible Catholic upbringing.