Search results

about right. the ideas are there, the application is ballsed up.

"So work from home if you can, but you should go to work if you can’t work from home. And to ensure you are safe at work we have been working to establish new guidance for employers to make workplaces COVID-secure." i suppose it is unclear for anyone who heard the first line and not the next...

to add to other answer, furlough is already extended to end of June.

no. they cant practice social distancing at work either, so wont be expected to return to work. i think we're about to engage in a national state of obtuseness as people fail to work through the information.

is that known or an assumption, do all EU approved contrators match with NHS standards?

flow and brevity.

dont disagree how it should be, its way it is and has been for a couple of decades. if you dont the media would fill their pages speculating and attacking everything they perceive to be wrong. so the politicans go for the slightly easier route, control the daily message as much as you can.

been saying that for weeks, the media has to be fed. most the infomation is inaccurate or subject to change.

the PPE from Turkey is farcical, who orders the wrong specification? or did the supplier not have compliant product?

confusing argument, blaming PM personal then SAGE, who changed their advice on basis of new evidence. you're better to stick to blaming PM without the SAGE contradictions.

good data.

are the right questions asked? would the lockdown starting a week earlier change much, or would the policy to move elderly patients out of hospitals to carehomes have more significant effect?

we wont know either until later in the year or next. week on week it looks terrible, year on year it may not show at all.

just saying the politicans gave in to the clamour for targets.

answer to the three questions, why the wittering on about Turkey, the 100k target and the 20k target, was to pander to media. handling of the 100k target is an own goal given the effort to ramp up testing, and more diverse testing than other countries have so far. a lot of decisions were by the...

:shrug: rock and hard place for those inclinded to worry about it. im not particularly concerned with either, but then i work with data. the NHS one delivers more, will be far more productive.

the question you pose is, do you trust Google/Apple or NHS. the decentralised app presented by Google/Apple is maybe decentralised, they have to do some centralised processing, data transfers to match people otherwise it will be fairly ineffective. they promise not to use this data or...

the pro-conservative will say it prepared finance, the anti-conservative will say they are to blame for no preparation of health service. no one will pay attention on what was prepared for or wasn't, if this is the same or if it was affected. dont think theres been much relection yet that...

considering the 100k target was expected to include serology tests, which havent really come through, getting near there is a decent recovery.

the vaccine is from Oxford university, the production and distribution is Astrazeneca. the vaccine itself is based on work being done for some time by Oxford's Jenner Institute on general coronaviruses, which is why they've been able to go to trails so quickly.