Search results

No - you are far from that thick.

Good grief. I assume this is a wind up. Nobody could be this thick.

The graph you posted is embarrassing. Is that why you only posted a blurry image of it rather than a link so people could read the data and basis of it? For starters it shows the % of (reported) care home casualties, within each country, but deliberately presented as total numbers. Bother to...

I’m under no illusions here - I know I’m wasting my time, given the absolute nature of your bias, but I’ve got little better to do right now... On your first point, you are plain wrong in your assessment of what is going on. Let’s take testing as a simple example. If the government were doing a...

What an gnorant, I’ll-informed post. Labour got a shoeing at the 2019 general election, in terms of seats won. Fair enough - those are the rules. But in terms of actual voting figures - the difference between the two major parties is not that stark (13m v 10m voters). And that was a Labour...

‘Winding the nation up’? What an insanely odd take. Calling out mistakes, and bad policy, is literally the point of the opposition. Are you seriously suggesting that it would be better not to alert the public to problems - in the name of ‘unity’? I hope you didn’t bet too much. I didn’t vote...

Indeed. The opposition highlighting mistakes, and flawed policy, is THEIR JOB - and directly, or indirectly, that process IS constructive.. Loyal, died-in-the-wool Tories, like Mouldy Boots and Is it PotG? * clearly find that an uncomfortable truth, but there you are - that's their issue. *...

What made you think that? Genuine question? (Given that at no stage has any representative of the other parties being invited to join?)

Herr Tubthumper needs to add the Mail on Sunday to his Pant Shitter list. So - the story is, that in 1996, a young human-rights lawyer, generously buys a field behind his parents house for a few thousand pounds, so his disabled mother can use it to look after rescued donkeys. The land is...

Well, it’s irrelevant isn’t it? Nobody who supports Johnson is going to watch it.

Anyway Herr Tubthumper - another one for your list of pant-shitters.

Well, he’s a lawyer - ensuring everybody’s RIGHTS are protected is what they are bound to do. What nobody HAS to do, is entertain them at Downing Street, or KNIGHT the ****ers.

Indeed. Times of emergency, etc - Johnson will very soon be ‘too busy’ to find time for PMQs. At least until he is able to have a jeering cheer-squad of clapping seals in place, to drown out anything tricky.

Strangely, this issue doesn’t seem to have been of particular concern to Tory supporters in the past.

Completely

Agreed

Indeed. And the likes of Is it PotG? know this just as well as the rest of us, of course. But like all of the rest of the Tory sycophants he’s embarrassed by his hero’s failings, and needs to try to defend the indefensible at every turn, however silly it looks. Attacking any criticism, fair...

If it ultimately sees off this government, then yes, in the long term, it does. (Note that by ‘us’, I at least, refer to the people of the UK)

Really excellent analogy, from the Telegraph of all places; It’s always the toughest stage of The Apprentice: the interviews round. A slick-haired young telemarketer in a shiny suit will swagger in, and start bragging about the foolproof business idea he’s had – only for the interviewer to take...

Which part of ‘advice in place until 12th March’ was ambiguous?