symyjym
Banned
If it can run more efficiently I don't see a problem with privatisation. It also makes people personally responsible rather than passing the buck through the system when it goes wrong. It will always be free and publicly funded.
If there's a profit to be made, then it will all be about the profit - **** the customer.
Corrected for you.
I can't see that working. For the NHS, less visits from the patient/customer is good. We generally hope they don't kill the patients off, because there's not much in it for them if they do. But we wouldn't want a privatised company getting the same payment regardless of whether they kill off all their patients or not.But seriously, if these companies invest in state of the art equipment and upgrade their technologies, they may well earn what they deserve, both in saving peoples lives, quick diagnosis and with less visits needed from the customer.
I can't see that working. For the NHS, less visits from the patient/customer is good. We generally hope they don't kill the patients off, because there's not much in it for them if they do. But we wouldn't want a privatised company getting the same payment regardless of whether they kill off all their patients or not.
I'd like to see Labour and the Tories join forces and employ some very smart people to come up with a plan that successive governments could follow. I don't like the NHS being used as a pawn, and I certainly don't want people to have to get insurance.
But seriously, if these companies invest in state of the art equipment and upgrade their technologies,