Insel affe
HellBilly
What I was actually saying is that Oscar wont panic and rush out to sign a loan player now, which is what most on here want, but wait until the January window opens and bring one or some in then.
yep
What I was actually saying is that Oscar wont panic and rush out to sign a loan player now, which is what most on here want, but wait until the January window opens and bring one or some in then.
We had a decent one but we flogged him in January for no good reason.
Why is it so hard to understand why Barnes left?
Why is it so hard to understand why Barnes left?
Why is it so hard to understand why Barnes was sold on??
It's not. Why was it so hard for the club to understand that selling Barnes left us seriously short of proven striking options at this level?
Because
1: The money we got for him was peanuts if he would have fired or contributed to a few goals say against Blackpool, Huddersfield..... we know he can do it..... to the promised land.
2: He has helped and he has Burnley achieve the promised land for peanuts.
It's not. Why was it so hard for the club to understand that selling Barnes left us seriously short of proven striking options at this level?
I'm guessing it had something to do with a substancial amount of money that we wouldn't have got if he were to leave for free in the summer.
There was no guarantee that if he had stayed and not been sold we would be any better off anyhow.
That would be my guess
Point 2 is amusing. Do you think Burnley would have struggled without him?
Barnes is Sean Dyche's only cash signing in 22 months in charge. Guess he knows a good player when he sees one. Wouldn't have taken much to keep him here. same as all the rest of the talent being allowed to drift away from the club to play in the Premier League. Still, as long as the accountants are happy, eh?
Point 2 is amusing. Do you think Burnley would have struggled without him?
Your love in with Barnes is unhealthy....
I think there's a lot to be said for good business sense.
Its impossible to say whether things would have panned out differently had he stayed. I personally think with the way Oscar likes to pick his teams, Barnes wouldn't have got a game all the time Ulloa was fit.
Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ;6303251 said:There was an article on BBC the other day saying the Barnes fee was £400k, but the figure on here is always quoted as £700k. Which was it? If we cashed in for £400k without getting a replacement in is a bit cheap.
Still 400k more than we would have got for him 3 months later............... Bought for 60k sold for say 400k (which is the minimum figure banded about). That's a decent ROI.
Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ;6303251 said:There was an article on BBC the other day saying the Barnes fee was £400k, but the figure on here is always quoted as £700k. Which was it? If we cashed in for £400k without getting a replacement in is a bit cheap.
Still 400k more than we would have got for him 3 months later............... Bought for 60k sold for say 400k (which is the minimum figure banded about). That's a decent ROI.
Ulloa NEVER looks fit. He huffs and puffs away like an unfit thing. And the chances that have gone begging at the North Stand goal in the past few games, Barnes would have tucked away some of them, guaranteed. Only genuine goal poacher (previously) at the club. Which leaves Hoskins as next best bet. CMS is CMS and will be forever counting on through balls that just don't come. Or they actually hit him on the back of the head like one did v Blackpool.