sir albion
New member
It would be yet more money wasted if we get this keeper in...You'd think we was left with just one teen keeper and desperate,unreal.
You can get a last minute emergency if the worse happens which lets be honest is very unlikely to happen.It will be temporary cover only. We need three keepers as injury or illness can happen at any time, which is why Brezovan played at Huddersfield two years ago. Kuszczak had a poisoned finger, Ankergren was ill, so we had to use our third choice keeper. It will be cheap and nothing like trying to find a striker.
This is the correct answer. How people have so much difficulty trying to understand this baffles me.
Spot onOh sorry if some of us get carried away with the FFP and saving money. I understand we made the safety officer redundant last week, is that so we can spend his wages TOWARDS the wages of another keeper to get splinters in his a*se?
How did stock dale hurt his hand
You can get a last minute emergency if the worse happens which lets be honest is very unlikely to happen.
Because strikers aren't cheap and they don't want to spend money getting one in.
- Also obviously assuming all of the above fall into place and you're absolutely sure they will add something to our existing squad and that they will be scoring goals / playing well then it begs the question how come they are available in the first place?
It would be yet more money wasted if we get this keeper in...You'd think we was left with just one teen keeper and desperate,unreal.
Complete waste of money as Walton and Casper can cover til He's back...You do have to question what goes on with the recruiting here at times.If one of these gets injured at some point then just get an emergency loan at the last minute,but no need to get another keeper in when we have two.
chaileyjem;6639060; We already have 5 fit first team strikers. [/QUOTE said:Though statistically, it seems, not fit for purpose.
It will be temporary cover only. We need three keepers as injury or illness can happen at any time, which is why Brezovan played at Huddersfield two years ago. Kuszczak had a poisoned finger, Ankergren was ill, so we had to use our third choice keeper.
But we have three 'keepers - you're now advocating that we need four. One is injured leaving us with, as far as we are aware, two fully fit 'keepers including one bright young prospect who performed well at Spurs on Tuesday night.
I can understand that given our perilous position Hyypia wouldn't want to take chances, but if we really do not rate Ankergren as a capable stand-in we shouldn't have re-signed him.
Yes, but as I pointed out, one of those two fully fit keepers may have an illness or injury at any time. It happened two years ago, and we went into a game without a keeper on the bench.
Al Habsi is a very good keeper, could even be better than Stockdale. However, we already have 2, surely the money will be better spent on a striker?