Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Dale Stephens Summer 2016 shenanigans (Merged Thread)







LamieRobertson

Not awoke
Feb 3, 2008
46,760
SHOREHAM BY SEA
some random brighton fan tweeted that stephens is refusing to play for next match. Teams news appears and no stephens - coincidence ?

We play awful away to reading and miss him.

Hughton says he needs extra training and that why he was dropped. I'm not convinced by that or others.

Next game comes along and it's a big one and everyone expected stephens to be in the starting line up after a poor performance at reading.

No stephens again and our midfield is over run again. He didn't even come on but norwood did.

If people still want to believe what hughton says then they are fooling themselves. He will be sold in the next couple of days. Fact

opinion
 




Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
59,632
The Fatherland








Super Steve Earle

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2009
8,368
North of Brighton
He'd better go after all this fuss, because he is costing us points 'not being ready' at the moment. Point is that Kayal and Stephens have more as individuals than Norwood or Sidwell. Not playing Kayal and Stephens together means we are weaker in midfield than last season, whatever other combo.
 


chaileyjem

#BarberIn
NSC Patron
Jun 27, 2012
13,911
That's as may be, but he wasn't one of the three options. My nap is on him not being a Brighton player come Thursday.

Whether he is or he isn't then the assumption that we're selling him based on the hokey cokey of his appearances over the last 6 weeks (he's gone, he's back, he's off, he's back, he's on the bench, he's gone, FACT) are a complete red herring.

He'll go or he won't. There's nothing about yesterday that indicates it either way.
Its all down to him, the offers we get or not over the next few days and money.

He could have played all 90 minutes yesterday or spent the day at home in Sussex. It wouldn't have made any difference.
 




BensGrandad

New member
Jul 13, 2003
72,015
Haywards Heath
Whether he is or he isn't then the assumption that we're selling him based on the hokey cokey of his appearances over the last 6 weeks (he's gone, he's back, he's off, he's back, he's on the bench, he's gone, FACT) are a complete red herring.

He'll go or he won't. There's nothing about yesterday that indicates it either way.
Its all down to him, the offers we get or not over the next few days and money.

He could have played all 90 minutes yesterday or spent the day at home in Sussex. It wouldn't have made any difference.

Had he played we may have stopped Shelvey controlling the game as it appears that NONE of the other midfielders that we have are anywhere near him in ability or able to play with Kayal in the dual central role.
 


Dorset Seagull

Once Dolphin, Now Seagull
Probably already been said but this is my take. The club have set a minimum figure they will accept for Stephens but although close nobody has yet bid enough. That could happen as we near the end of the window so it makes sense not to play him. The cover story about his fitness is being used so that if nobody offers what we want then he can slip back into the team with the minimum of fuss and without either party being seen to blame. If the club were to be more open about the transfer dealings then it would be detrimental to both parties as well as showing our hand in any negotiations.

I don't see how else the club could handle this difficult situation.
 


clippedgull

Hotdogs, extra onions
Aug 11, 2003
20,789
Near Ducks, Geese, and Seagulls
Probably already been said but this is my take. The club have set a minimum figure they will accept for Stephens but although close nobody has yet bid enough. That could happen as we near the end of the window so it makes sense not to play him. The cover story about his fitness is being used so that if nobody offers what we want then he can slip back into the team with the minimum of fuss and without either party being seen to blame. If the club were to be more open about the transfer dealings then it would be detrimental to both parties as well as showing our hand in any negotiations.

I don't see how else the club could handle this difficult situation.

Obviously none of us know the what is going on with Stephens, but, it seems bizarre to take a player (seen by some as our best midfield player) on a 700 mile round trip if (A) His head is not in the right place possibly due to transfer speculation (B) He is not match fit and therefore not used as a substitution with Norwood being preferred over him.
 




BensGrandad

New member
Jul 13, 2003
72,015
Haywards Heath
Obviously none of us know the what is going on with Stephens, but, it seems bizarre to take a player (seen by some as our best midfield player) on a 700 mile round trip if (A) His head is not in the right place possibly due to transfer speculation (B) He is not match fit and therefore not used as a substitution with Norwood being preferred over him.

Something gone wrong as I agree with you.
 


crasher

New member
Jul 8, 2003
2,764
Sussex
Obviously none of us know the what is going on with Stephens, but, it seems bizarre to take a player (seen by some as our best midfield player) on a 700 mile round trip if (A) His head is not in the right place possibly due to transfer speculation (B) He is not match fit and therefore not used as a substitution with Norwood being preferred over him.

Not necessarily I'd argue. It looks better for both club and Stephens if he travels with the team. Then, if he doesn't leave next week, it looks like less of a climb-down for all concerned and much easier to integrate him back into the side with his team-mates.

And if he does go, it won't leave quite the nasty taste that refusing to play does (as it did with Bridcutt).
 


Sussex Nomad

Well-known member
Aug 26, 2010
18,185
EP
Whether he is or he isn't then the assumption that we're selling him based on the hokey cokey of his appearances over the last 6 weeks (he's gone, he's back, he's off, he's back, he's on the bench, he's gone, FACT) are a complete red herring.

He'll go or he won't. There's nothing about yesterday that indicates it either way.
Its all down to him, the offers we get or not over the next few days and money.

He could have played all 90 minutes yesterday or spent the day at home in Sussex. It wouldn't have made any difference.

But mate, we needed him yesterday and he wasn't used.
 








sir albion

New member
Jan 6, 2007
13,055
SWINDON
With the window slamming shut I hope it's not a case of sell and rush in another player at the last minute...If he's off and any chance then sell and move on ASAP :)
 


Cheeky Monkey

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
23,044
Sick to death of hearing about him, or not hearing about him. Even if we as a club are destined to always be the bridesmaid, at least we can say we've had a first eleven down the years who've all played in the Premier League - Buckley, Bridcutt, Stephens, Ward, Ulloa, Wilson, Barnes, Kuszcsak, Cook, Elphick, Zamora, Sidwell etc.
 




Binney on acid

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 30, 2003
2,498
Shoreham
Sick to death of hearing about him, or not hearing about him. Even if we as a club are destined to always be the bridesmaid, at least we can say we've had a first eleven down the years who've all played in the Premier League - Buckley, Bridcutt, Stephens, Ward, Ulloa, Wilson, Barnes, Kuszcsak, Cook, Elphick, Zamora, Sidwell etc.
How many of them made an impact at that level and how many of them were not loanees? Bridcutt did score for Southampton though.
 


chaileyjem

#BarberIn
NSC Patron
Jun 27, 2012
13,911
But mate, we needed him yesterday and he wasn't used.

Stephens has off days. Who knows ?
Anyway i'm saying his appearance in the squad or not makes no difference, despite those 100% confident that its a signal he's staying or going (FACT!) etc etc.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here