alfredmizen
Banned
- Mar 11, 2015
- 6,342
I think you're doing Sara Keats a disservice there mate, read what she said properly and she simply wants to spare her daughter any avoidable distress.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Cecil Parkinson - Good bye and Good riddance
- Thread starter drew
- Start date
downham seagull
New member
You have fallen into to age old trap of not actually reading my post because nowhere do I say about respecting the individual and nowhere do I mention mourning either. Nothing to to do with being blinded unlike you who can't even read and understand properly. Not nice to jump to conclusions but I won't hold it against you
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 70,434
Sorry mate. but seem to recall at the time that Sara Keats and her nasty Tory parents deliberately dragged their dirty washing as much into the public eye as they could, in order to bring their Tory sleazeball quarry down. Like I say, both of the poor kid's cold-hearted biological parents are fully deserving of each other.
drew
Drew
- Thread starter
- #84
I think most people that are berating him are not doing so because of his infidelity but because of his utter rejection of the consequence of that infidelity. There are plenty of politicians, and people in other walks of life for that matter, that have strayed but I'm not aware of any that have behaved in the way he has to the one person who was wholly innocent of his and Sara Keays affair.
You seem to want to play the party politics card so would it be fair to assume that, assuming you are leaning towards the right rather than the left, you hold him in the highest regard?
As with Janner, politics plays no part in it.
GT49er
Well-known member
Before reading this article I wasn't at all concerned about the passing of a very slimy politician who operated in, and gleefully supported, some of the most anti-social years of selfish Tory politics; after reading it, I'm rather glad I'm no longer breathing the same oxygen as him.
alfredmizen
Banned
- Mar 11, 2015
- 6,342
We will have to agree to disagree mate , he'll hath no fury etc, I have to say I'd probably be of the same mindset as Sara keays and her parents if it were my daughter , once Parkinson had shown he was going to shirk his responsibilities , in fact not just that but act in such a callous manner, I'd have wanted to cause him as much pain as possible .
As a politician he came across as snooty and slimy.
He had an affair, was married and both consenting parties knew this. As he never got involved with his child, ignored her and worse, is worse for me than his behaviour in politics. Obviously his family and some will mourn their loss.
He had an affair, was married and both consenting parties knew this. As he never got involved with his child, ignored her and worse, is worse for me than his behaviour in politics. Obviously his family and some will mourn their loss.
JC Footy Genius
Bringer of TRUTH
- Jun 9, 2015
- 10,568
Quite possibly but you're quoting the part of my previous post where I was responding to a broader point about infidelity not this particular case.
If you read back through my posts on this thread you will see I differentiate between some people including you who have condemned him for his behaviour to his daughter and some who have some political axe to grind. You will also see I have at no point defended or supported his actions, quite the opposite in fact.
Diego Napier
Well-known member
- Mar 27, 2010
- 4,416
Your original implication was obvious; your subsequent attempted obfuscation is risible.
Diego Napier
Well-known member
- Mar 27, 2010
- 4,416
Well, this post really does reveal all anyone would ever need to know about you.
kevo
Well-known member
- Mar 8, 2008
- 9,127
Hilarious. I was responding to the fact you labelled all Labour voters as "vitriolic" and "horrible people".
That was your comment. And I don't agree with you.
And yes, it makes you stupid.
maltaseagull
Well-known member
Try reading it again .
I said " Many Labour posters on here are extremely vitriolic against anything Tory whereas Tory posters tend to be much less so.
I still disagree with you.But prepared to call it quits. You think I am stupid. I think you are a moron
Last edited:
Hampster Gull
New member
- Dec 22, 2010
- 13,462
....
Last edited:
downham seagull
New member
Yep!! you have done it again!
Diego Napier
Well-known member
- Mar 27, 2010
- 4,416
Ok, either you're being deliberately abstruse, disingenuous, trying to wriggle off the hook or just plain thick so let's break this down:
Although for some reason you structured this as two sentences, this is a clear statement implying that as he has just died then he shouldn't be criticised.
The truth has been published widely and is not in the sole domain of the gutter press so you are wrong. You are also wrong to suggest that his cowardly and dishonourable actions are above criticism.
What do you mean by this preposterous statement? Don't put this on anyone else, it is all about him. "Your honour, I ask you to find the defendant not guilty of murder as other people have got away with it before".
Reread the first quote, stop with all the dissembling and stop kidding yourself (you're certainly not kidding me), your implication is crystal clear - respect the dead.
Of course you didn't mention mourning; I did, as a parody to highlight how ridiculous you posturing comes across. Derrr, keep-up at the back please!
Talking of jumping to conclusions, I can read and understand clearly enough to see right through you.
Oh c'mon, give me something better to work with than this flabby-brained flappy-mouthed platitudinous attempt at a rejoinder.
Although for some reason you structured this as two sentences, this is a clear statement implying that as he has just died then he shouldn't be criticised.
The truth has been published widely and is not in the sole domain of the gutter press so you are wrong. You are also wrong to suggest that his cowardly and dishonourable actions are above criticism.
What do you mean by this preposterous statement? Don't put this on anyone else, it is all about him. "Your honour, I ask you to find the defendant not guilty of murder as other people have got away with it before".
Reread the first quote, stop with all the dissembling and stop kidding yourself (you're certainly not kidding me), your implication is crystal clear - respect the dead.
Of course you didn't mention mourning; I did, as a parody to highlight how ridiculous you posturing comes across. Derrr, keep-up at the back please!
Talking of jumping to conclusions, I can read and understand clearly enough to see right through you.
Oh c'mon, give me something better to work with than this flabby-brained flappy-mouthed platitudinous attempt at a rejoinder.
downham seagull
New member
Too much time on your hands! Go back to your Crystal Ball or Abacus because 2 + 2 does equal 5. If the best you can come up with is asumptions and mind reading than you have lost the argument.
The Birdman
New member
he would be a normal politician in France or Italy having a bit extra on the side he was one of Maggie loyalist surporters. R.I.P
daveinprague
New member
Im not sure that his actions would be considered normal anywhere.
Regardless of his politics, he was a complete twunt.
Blimey, this could be the first thread in which [MENTION=31796]alfredmizen[/MENTION] and [MENTION=14574]daveinprague[/MENTION] broadly agree. (And the last I suspect). God bless you Cecil, your wandering willy has brought them together.
daveinprague
New member
We also agree on other issues believe it or not, particularly the State of Israel
