View attachment 51751
How on earth has this PRICK not made it into the selections?
Biased, smug, thick and extremely dull in equal measure.
This !!!!
Why isn't the tedious Mark 'Dim' in the poll ?
View attachment 51751
How on earth has this PRICK not made it into the selections?
Biased, smug, thick and extremely dull in equal measure.
Billy Davies. He counts, right?
Agree totally about Crooks and Bright especially the former.
He has to be worst ever in the history of my football watching!
Can't stand Andy Gray and hope his rebirth is short lived.
Garth Crooks.
His full name is "Steve Claridge, full of schmit, clueless windbag, unaware of the rules of the game, and monotonous as a funeral bell (828 League Appearances, 255 goals)".
I agree that Ron had to go for his uncharacteristic yet unforgiveable racist outburst, but up until that point he was THE DADDY of punditry with some incredible terminology the like of which we haven't seen since. A brief flavour:
Early Doors, Spotter's Badge, Full Gun, Little Eyebrows, Back Stick, Lollipop, Crowd Scene, Going Down By Instalments, Tell You What Clive
On to the poll then. I admit I have sat on my sofa open-mouthed at the catastrophoc landslide of boulder-shaped 24-carat DRIVEL which erupts forth from that odd, over-gesticulating shambles known as Garth Crooks. This is a man so grotesquely bloated with his own sense of self-importance, and enlightening, razor-sharp perception of the game, that every one of his questions is framed in the manner of an extensive, tedious droning monologue about pension reform from a minor minister at a Tory party conference. This will usually result in a one-word answer, "yes" or "no". That is if the interviewee hasn't already collapsed through malnourishment halfway through, or has simply given up the will to live.
As with most people, especially football pundits, a move to ITV has served to massively reduce his talents. Chiles was perfectly decent on MOTD2 back in the day, but is now a fat mong.Had Chiles been included in the poll he would have certainly got my vote, shows remarkably little insight for someone who is apparently a huge football fan (though I suppose the same could be said of many supporters!).
Superb parallel drawn there, great work.Mark Lawrenson is the Dimitar Berbatov of commentary. He can be good when he can be bothered, but that's only 10% of the time.