Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Tory meltdown finally arrived [was: incoming]...



Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Twas ever thus (maybe a bit worse under New Labour) ..

52E035F3-93BA-4DEA-B81D-552AF48531A0.jpeg
 














Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
50,444
Faversham
Apparently hopeless secretary, Sue Ellen Braverman is in Rwanda right now, looking at arrangements for the deportation gambit.

The BBC also stated minutes ago that nobody has been sent there yet owing to legal challenges.

What the f***? Why can't a government minister get anything done. Shitehouse. Get Rid!
 


jcdenton08

Enemy of the People
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
10,748
Apparently hopeless secretary, Sue Ellen Braverman is in Rwanda right now, looking at arrangements for the deportation gambit.
The BBC also stated minutes ago that nobody has been sent there yet owing to legal challenges.

What the f***? Why can't a government minister get anything done. Shitehouse. Get Rid!
Mental. Absolute disgrace. I strongly suspect they have no plans where they are planning on sending these unfortunate people to or the quality of their care once there. They’re paying to get rid and it becomes someone else’s problem. It’s shameful.
 


Hugo Rune

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 23, 2012
21,667
Brighton
Really thought he was going back to Henley. Will do well to hang on, awful MP

He might be fighting for his seat sooner than the next election.

 




nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
17,648
Gods country fortnightly
Saddle up for Johnson's defence...

I misled MPs, but not intentionally or recklessly
 




Pavilionaire

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
30,632
I misled you, but I did it in good faith. For once, Boris is telling the truth.

In his mind, "in good faith" will mean "honesty or sincerity of intention".

Effectively, he is saying "I misled you, and that was my honest and sincere intention".
 






chickens

Intending to survive this time of asset strippers
NSC Patron
Oct 12, 2022
1,883
The DUP and ERG have rejected Sunaks deal on the NI issue.

The civil war will rumble on!

At this rate, Labour will be shaping the new agreement after the next general election. The ERG have been foolish here, their time of influence is, I very much suspect, drawing to a close.
 


Reddleman

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
1,900
I am absolutely sick to death of the ERG and their ‘influence’ on British politics. If Sunak had anything about him he would impose a three line whip and anyone who voted against the bill loses the whip. The bill would still pass with Labour support and finally they could lance the boil. He won’t though.
 




Rdodge30

Well-known member
Dec 30, 2022
445
At this rate, Labour will be shaping the new agreement after the next general election. The ERG have been foolish here, their time of influence is, I very much suspect, drawing to a close.
Ridiculous sabotage from the ERG

However Labour will bring with them their own equivalent with the Socialist Campaign Group within their parliamentary party

And so it goes and so it goes
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
I misled you, but I did it in good faith. For once, Boris is telling the truth.

In his mind, "in good faith" will mean "honesty or sincerity of intention".

Effectively, he is saying "I misled you, and that was my honest and sincere intention".
Ignorance is no defence of the law.

Mistake or ignorance of law. Ignorance or mistake of law is no defence to a criminal charge; mens rea does not involve knowledge on the part of a defendant that his acts or omissions were against the law and constituted a crime1.
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
25,927
I am absolutely sick to death of the ERG and their ‘influence’ on British politics. If Sunak had anything about him he would impose a three line whip and anyone who voted against the bill loses the whip. The bill would still pass with Labour support and finally they could lance the boil. He won’t though.
I agree the bill will pass anyway and about the ERG's ongoing idiocy, but what boil will replacing Johnson's 'Northern Ireland Protocol' with May's 'Northern Ireland backstop', now rebranded Sunak's 'Windsor Framework' lance exactly ? :shrug:
 


MJsGhost

Oooh Matron, I'm an
NSC Patron
Jun 26, 2009
4,522
East
Ignorance is no defence of the law.

Mistake or ignorance of law. Ignorance or mistake of law is no defence to a criminal charge; mens rea does not involve knowledge on the part of a defendant that his acts or omissions were against the law and constituted a crime1.
Is this not about the parliamentary code of conduct rather than the law?

He's trying to say he didn't intentionally mislead the House, even though the investigation suggests that what he said was wrong.

Any sane person would look at the circumstances and decide that he knew enough AT THE TIME to know that the parties were against the rules and therefore he deliberately misled the House with his statements about them, but he has spent a sh|t-tonne of taxpayer's money on Lord Pannick to try and wheedle out on a technicality again.

Someone just needs to put the scruffy c**t in the bin, then in the sea, then on a slowboat to Rwanda
 




rippleman

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2011
4,585
Is this not about the parliamentary code of conduct rather than the law?

He's trying to say he didn't intentionally mislead the House, even though the investigation suggests that what he said was wrong.

Any sane person would look at the circumstances and decide that he knew enough AT THE TIME to know that the parties were against the rules and therefore he deliberately misled the House with his statements about them, but he has spent a sh|t-tonne of taxpayer's money on Lord Pannick to try and wheedle out on a technicality again.

Someone just needs to put the scruffy c**t in the bin, then in the sea, then on a slowboat to Rwanda
Is that before or after he has been ploughed into The Clamp's ditch?
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Is this not about the parliamentary code of conduct rather than the law?

He's trying to say he didn't intentionally mislead the House, even though the investigation suggests that what he said was wrong.

Any sane person would look at the circumstances and decide that he knew enough AT THE TIME to know that the parties were against the rules and therefore he deliberately misled the House with his statements about them, but he has spent a sh|t-tonne of taxpayer's money on Lord Pannick to try and wheedle out on a technicality again.

Someone just needs to put the scruffy c**t in the bin, then in the sea, then on a slowboat to Rwanda
He's saying nobody told him it was wrong, or that is the way I have read it.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here