[News] The World at War

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊













armchairclubber

Well-known member
Aug 8, 2010
1,921
Bexhill




jakarta

Well-known member
May 25, 2007
16,001
Sullington
Bloody great series. My old history teacher Mr Waters at Stringer used to show it to us - was my first exposure to Larry Olivier’s work too :lol: everyone else was mucking abaaaht but I would watch intently. Bloody good programme to this day if you like history
Recently bought the Richard Holmes book of The World at War which essentially is much of the stuff that was edited out of the magnificent series due to the time scales the producer was given (26 episodes @ 52 minutes).

Slowly chugging through it, fascinating and horrifying in equal measure...
 


Westdene Seagull

aka Cap'n Carl Firecrotch
NSC Patron
Oct 27, 2003
21,896
The arse end of Hangleton
Bloody great series. My old history teacher Mr Waters at Stringer used to show it to us - was my first exposure to Larry Olivier’s work too :lol: everyone else was mucking abaaaht but I would watch intently. Bloody good programme to this day if you like history
It should be compulsary viewing in schools to show the true horrors of war.

I re-watched the first three episodes yesterday after this thread pointed me to U streaming. The first episode charting the rise of the Nazis has some compelling and scarey comparisons to what is happening in the US currently.
 


abc

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2007
1,663
It should be compulsary viewing in schools to show the true horrors of war.

I re-watched the first three episodes yesterday after this thread pointed me to U streaming. The first episode charting the rise of the Nazis has some compelling and scarey comparisons to what is happening in the US currently.

I’ve always felt the same about Schindler's list as a way of illustrating where extremism, racism, bigotry of any sort (not only anti semitism) can take us.

Learning about causes and consequences is far more important than dates and battles.
 




Fritz the Cat

Member
Jan 6, 2022
72
Iran's regime is objectively evil. The continuance of their theocracy is a stain on humanity. I'm not having this "liberal Western democracies are actually the bad guys" rubbish.
I'm afraid that your view lacks a historical perspective. It was the 'liberal western democracies ' who overthrew the democratically elected Mossadegh and replaced him with the hated Shah. The Shah stayed in power by murder, torture and keeping the bulk of the Iranian people in a state of malnutrition. His regime was certainly 'objectively evil' - and hugely supported by America and Britain. Strangely enough Iranians - and many others in that region -don't see us as 'the good guys' but as hypocrites who assume the mantle of 'freedom and democracy but have actually imposed on many countries some of t6he most repressive regimes imaginable. Even worse is when the West withdraws from a situation and leaves nothing but chaos - Libya, Iraq being the most glaring recent examples.
 


abc

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2007
1,663
Reeves ‘not ruling out defending Israel against Iran’ this morning.

I hesitate to ask this here as I don’t want to start another set of anti/pro Israel posts that get out of hand but this is something I don’t understand:

Why would we even consider getting involved militarily? Germany, France etc won’t and we have no more ‘interests’ in the region than anyone else.

Genuine question, would appreciate an informed response please!🤞
 


peterward

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 11, 2009
13,435
Whilst I do not condone what Israel has done in Iran. The thought of Iran having nuclear weapons is frankly terrifying to me.
This.

What Israel have done in Gaza is indefensible and war crimes have been committed against innocent civilians imho.

But taking each situation on its own, Israel has little choice with Iran. In the last stages of developing a nuke and vowing to use it against Israel and wipe them off the earth. There is no good option.
 




The Fits

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2020
11,015
Reeves ‘not ruling out defending Israel against Iran’ this morning.

I hesitate to ask this here as I don’t want to start another set of anti/pro Israel posts that get out of hand but this is something I don’t understand:

Why would we even consider getting involved militarily? Germany, France etc won’t and we have no more ‘interests’ in the region than anyone else.

Genuine question, would appreciate an informed response please!🤞
Because we are Great Britain and we have an over inflated ego, and obsessed with both our relationship with the US and nostalgia. A heady combo.
 




Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
8,973
Reeves ‘not ruling out defending Israel against Iran’ this morning.

I hesitate to ask this here as I don’t want to start another set of anti/pro Israel posts that get out of hand but this is something I don’t understand:

Why would we even consider getting involved militarily? Germany, France etc won’t and we have no more ‘interests’ in the region than anyone else.

Genuine question, would appreciate an informed response please!🤞
PM’d you but basically Britain has strategic interests throughout the ME which are at risk if the war escalates into a (wider!) regional conflict - including oil interests and military bases.

Iran has threatened to target UK, French and US military personnel in the ME (which they can do by proxy from Iraq) if the UK and US help intercept missiles aimed at Israel.

So we are helping to intercept missiles aimed at Israel

:facepalm:

 




Hugo Rune

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 23, 2012
25,100
Brighton
Reeves ‘not ruling out defending Israel against Iran’ this morning.

I hesitate to ask this here as I don’t want to start another set of anti/pro Israel posts that get out of hand but this is something I don’t understand:

Why would we even consider getting involved militarily? Germany, France etc won’t and we have no more ‘interests’ in the region than anyone else.

Genuine question, would appreciate an informed response please!🤞

In order to answer this question properly, you have to separate 'Israel' into the state, the government, the residents, the IDF and the Jewish people.

As we've seen so many times, there are many people on both sides who are simply unable to do this so your caution in starting something that could get out of hand is justified.

The key word from Reeves here is 'defensive', Israel is still an ally. One could consider this British Government and any other you'd select from the last 40 years or so would take a similar approach to 'Israel' as this:

1. State of Israel = Ally
2. Residents of Israel = Westernised allies.
3. Jewish people = Protected minority in UK and allies abroad.
4. Israel Government = Varies. Two Israeli ministers have personal sanctions against them.
5. IDF - Varies.

The UK Government, alongside the USA and Russia are pushing for deescalation but if Israel request our help to protect their innocent civilians (apparently the US are covertly doing this anyway) the Government would have a big decision to make. We rarely let down our allies.
 




raymondo

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2017
9,917
Wiltshire
How come nobody stopped North Korea from obtaining nuclear weapons? Unlike Iran, Iraq, Libya and anyone else considered the bad guys, nobody is threatening them with any carpet bombing.
I think (but I dunno really) it's because it's thought/hoped that China will keep their mad neighbor under some control if needed.
 


Taybha

Whalewhine
Oct 8, 2008
28,226
Uwantsumorwat
If you have all the components to hand you can Google how to make a Nuclear ballistic missile so I'm not believing for 1 moment Iran hasn't already stashed a shit load away in a cupboard under the stairs somewhere.
They scooped up some of the worlds top scientists about 25 years ago for what?
Baking cakes,nah not having it,so if Israel continues to pound Iran I can only see this ending badly for the Eurovision bad boys.
 




abc

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2007
1,663
In order to answer this question properly, you have to separate 'Israel' into the state, the government, the residents, the IDF and the Jewish people.

As we've seen so many times, there are many people on both sides who are simply unable to do this so your caution in starting something that could get out of hand is justified.

The key word from Reeves here is 'defensive', Israel is still an ally. One could consider this British Government and any other you'd select from the last 40 years or so would take a similar approach to 'Israel' as this:

1. State of Israel = Ally
2. Residents of Israel = Westernised allies.
3. Jewish people = Protected minority in UK and allies abroad.
4. Israel Government = Varies. Two Israeli ministers have personal sanctions against them.
5. IDF - Varies.

The UK Government, alongside the USA and Russia are pushing for deescalation but if Israel request our help to protect their innocent civilians (apparently the US are covertly doing this anyway) the Government would have a big decision to make. We rarely let down our allies.

Thank you, really helpful. Could you elaborate why this means that the UK might get involved militarily but not (it appears) other European countries? Aside from the immediate post war history, do we have closer ties with Israel or have reason to be a more resolute ally than others?

Unfortunately it’s never really got off the ground but to me this is precisely the scenario for which the allies proposed the League of Nations post WW1 and the United Nations post WW2: collective and collaborative action to prevent escalation. It often feels that, apart from the US, we are the only western nation that stand up. In the 21st century I don’t understand why
 
Last edited:


rogersix

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2014
8,420
Very condescending, nice one.
My perspective is still the same and I haven't learnt anything new. I said my piece so have no real interest in arguing with the same 20 or so people who dominate these threads, all day every day.
i knew as much, you have no interest in learning about reality, nice one
the western allies are beyond reproach, that's just silly
make sure you don't interact with people who know some facts!
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top