They're close to getting it right, and no one questions this. That's my pointEvery time North Korea tests something it flops into the sea.
They're close to getting it right, and no one questions this. That's my pointEvery time North Korea tests something it flops into the sea.
the learning process is truly astonishing, isn't it?Iran's regime is objectively evil. The continuance of their theocracy is a stain on humanity. I'm not having this "liberal Western democracies are actually the bad guys" rubbish.
Starmer repeats call for de-escalation, moves jets to Middle East
![]()
UK moves jets to Middle East as Starmer refuses to rule out defending Israel
Military assets to provide ‘contingency support’ as PM repeats call for de-escalation after Iran’s retaliatory strikeswww.theguardian.com
Recently bought the Richard Holmes book of The World at War which essentially is much of the stuff that was edited out of the magnificent series due to the time scales the producer was given (26 episodes @ 52 minutes).Bloody great series. My old history teacher Mr Waters at Stringer used to show it to us - was my first exposure to Larry Olivier’s work tooeveryone else was mucking abaaaht but I would watch intently. Bloody good programme to this day if you like history
It should be compulsary viewing in schools to show the true horrors of war.Bloody great series. My old history teacher Mr Waters at Stringer used to show it to us - was my first exposure to Larry Olivier’s work tooeveryone else was mucking abaaaht but I would watch intently. Bloody good programme to this day if you like history
It should be compulsary viewing in schools to show the true horrors of war.
I re-watched the first three episodes yesterday after this thread pointed me to U streaming. The first episode charting the rise of the Nazis has some compelling and scarey comparisons to what is happening in the US currently.
I'm afraid that your view lacks a historical perspective. It was the 'liberal western democracies ' who overthrew the democratically elected Mossadegh and replaced him with the hated Shah. The Shah stayed in power by murder, torture and keeping the bulk of the Iranian people in a state of malnutrition. His regime was certainly 'objectively evil' - and hugely supported by America and Britain. Strangely enough Iranians - and many others in that region -don't see us as 'the good guys' but as hypocrites who assume the mantle of 'freedom and democracy but have actually imposed on many countries some of t6he most repressive regimes imaginable. Even worse is when the West withdraws from a situation and leaves nothing but chaos - Libya, Iraq being the most glaring recent examples.Iran's regime is objectively evil. The continuance of their theocracy is a stain on humanity. I'm not having this "liberal Western democracies are actually the bad guys" rubbish.
This.Whilst I do not condone what Israel has done in Iran. The thought of Iran having nuclear weapons is frankly terrifying to me.
Because we are Great Britain and we have an over inflated ego, and obsessed with both our relationship with the US and nostalgia. A heady combo.Reeves ‘not ruling out defending Israel against Iran’ this morning.
I hesitate to ask this here as I don’t want to start another set of anti/pro Israel posts that get out of hand but this is something I don’t understand:
Why would we even consider getting involved militarily? Germany, France etc won’t and we have no more ‘interests’ in the region than anyone else.
Genuine question, would appreciate an informed response please!![]()
PM’d you but basically Britain has strategic interests throughout the ME which are at risk if the war escalates into a (wider!) regional conflict - including oil interests and military bases.Reeves ‘not ruling out defending Israel against Iran’ this morning.
I hesitate to ask this here as I don’t want to start another set of anti/pro Israel posts that get out of hand but this is something I don’t understand:
Why would we even consider getting involved militarily? Germany, France etc won’t and we have no more ‘interests’ in the region than anyone else.
Genuine question, would appreciate an informed response please!![]()
Reeves ‘not ruling out defending Israel against Iran’ this morning.
I hesitate to ask this here as I don’t want to start another set of anti/pro Israel posts that get out of hand but this is something I don’t understand:
Why would we even consider getting involved militarily? Germany, France etc won’t and we have no more ‘interests’ in the region than anyone else.
Genuine question, would appreciate an informed response please!![]()
Very condescending, nice one.the learning process is truly astonishing, isn't it?
I think (but I dunno really) it's because it's thought/hoped that China will keep their mad neighbor under some control if needed.How come nobody stopped North Korea from obtaining nuclear weapons? Unlike Iran, Iraq, Libya and anyone else considered the bad guys, nobody is threatening them with any carpet bombing.
In order to answer this question properly, you have to separate 'Israel' into the state, the government, the residents, the IDF and the Jewish people.
As we've seen so many times, there are many people on both sides who are simply unable to do this so your caution in starting something that could get out of hand is justified.
The key word from Reeves here is 'defensive', Israel is still an ally. One could consider this British Government and any other you'd select from the last 40 years or so would take a similar approach to 'Israel' as this:
1. State of Israel = Ally
2. Residents of Israel = Westernised allies.
3. Jewish people = Protected minority in UK and allies abroad.
4. Israel Government = Varies. Two Israeli ministers have personal sanctions against them.
5. IDF - Varies.
The UK Government, alongside the USA and Russia are pushing for deescalation but if Israel request our help to protect their innocent civilians (apparently the US are covertly doing this anyway) the Government would have a big decision to make. We rarely let down our allies.
i knew as much, you have no interest in learning about reality, nice oneVery condescending, nice one.
My perspective is still the same and I haven't learnt anything new. I said my piece so have no real interest in arguing with the same 20 or so people who dominate these threads, all day every day.