supaseagull
Well-known member
On the contrary. He offers a different option to what we currently have. He may not fit the current formation, but teams need to be versatile and have other tactics in the locker to win leagues.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Teixeria
- Thread starter Munchkin
- Start date
On the contrary. He offers a different option to what we currently have. He may not fit the current formation, but teams need to be versatile and have other tactics in the locker to win leagues.
- Jan 3, 2012
- 16,603
.....and presumably you are talking about a loan specifically of Mr Teixeira, and not just any old loan?
Could play as second striker in 4-4-1-1. I hope we vary our formations a bit. Tex made the wrong decision to shoot in the picture. And getting a picture was quite hard as he kept losing the ball.
I'd sooner play Lualua or Kayal in his position.
Hate loans. Come if you want to come and invest your future in the club.. If you don't, don't.
Zamora, Sidwell, Roberts, Danny Wilson, Peter Ward, McShane, Bridge, Upson, Kaz all were great on loan.
Bring back Bryan wade!!
I wanna caravan for me ma
As Bozza posted this in the 'Teixeira' thread I think that's a safe bet...... ��
B.W.
New member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 13,666
Now list the loan failures... ...if you have a week or two to spare!
I'll do that if you list the signed failures, you can start with our record signing if you wish.....
We're 7th at the moment, knocking on the door of the play-offs and challenging for one the two automatic promotion places
Taking our current position is ridiculous.
Sure, we're seventh now, but put it in context: that's down from first place. We're on a severe downward spiral. If sheffield wednesday show any interest, they'd probably have a better chance having soared from 22nd to 4th.
Langley
New member
Hope it isn't. Totally agree with Teddy Maybanks post earlier. If we have to have a loanee, I would prefer a player who is going to give his all, and Tex did not do that for me. Marginally better than Lingard, and he also did not inspire me.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
I rather think he knew that.
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,297
You didn't think we played well with 442 Friday?!
1066familyman
Radio User
- Jan 15, 2008
- 15,185
Interesting that he didn't even get on the bench for Liverpool today after an apparently very promising pre season. I thought they had high hopes for him. It might indicate that they still feel he's not quite the finished article for them but have faith enough to hold onto him. In that case they'll be wanting regular game time for him, perhaps a short term loan, to see where he is after that. Would we still be the preferred loan club now that Sammi's gone?, or are there any other clubs in our division with a strong Liverpool old boy connection that might get first choice? I'm sure they would have deemed his loan with us a success last season, but where does it fit in with CH's plans?
I think he'd be an asset to the team again without a doubt. Yes, he can be lightweight ( I felt his injury was ironic considering it was the first challenge he seemed to make with us where he actually went in full blooded) and can blow hot and cold, as creative players are sometimes prone to be, but on a good day he's a game changer. He can certainly weigh in with some much needed goals too, and unless we sign another proven striker to hopefully play instead of Baldock, then we're going to need goals from wherever we can get them again as I fear so far we are still light up front.
I think he'd be an asset to the team again without a doubt. Yes, he can be lightweight ( I felt his injury was ironic considering it was the first challenge he seemed to make with us where he actually went in full blooded) and can blow hot and cold, as creative players are sometimes prone to be, but on a good day he's a game changer. He can certainly weigh in with some much needed goals too, and unless we sign another proven striker to hopefully play instead of Baldock, then we're going to need goals from wherever we can get them again as I fear so far we are still light up front.
Thank you for saving me the trouble, TB.
BrianWade4
Well-known member
Buy him please. Thank you
I'd like to think he knows that I knew he knew it.
EDIT:
Apparently not.
Read the second paragraph again.
The Brighton Buzz
Falmer here we come
- Jan 31, 2008
- 1,277
I think whether he comes on loan depends on how the club look upon Harper. It would appear that they are similar players, both roughly the same age, and the club have already said they want Harper to be challenging for a place when fit. They may consider that money will be spent elsewhere.
That's okay, you're allowed to. [emoji6]
Would this loan be similar to our loan of Monakana to Bristol Rovers in terms of length & time? If we can't get our permanent signings in till the end of August, it may be worthwhile getting cover for March & Lua Lua in the shorter term and strengthening a bench devoid of attacking options.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
He came to us on 15th August last season for his season long loan. Monankana has only gone out for a month's loan. Hughton has said he isn't a fan of short loans, and I believe the 'emergency loan' system is being done away with.
It was dreadful when we have Wayne Bridge but only paid a quarter of his wages wasn't it?
Hate loans. Come if you want to come and invest your future in the club.. If you don't, don't.
