- Thread starter
- #121
No you clearly stated "consumer" & "choice, dont try and wriggle out of it.
Go and re-read post #18. My reply which you quote above is a clear response to a post about competition for jobs.
No you clearly stated "consumer" & "choice, dont try and wriggle out of it.
No you clearly stated "consumer" & "choice, dont try and wriggle out of it.
We all need a job with fair pay don't we. What we don't need is extra competition from jobs.
As a consumer I want competition and choice.
Insulting my original post, which he clearly had neither read or maybe not understood, by calling it typical left wing bull shit will provoke a reaction will it not?
Nobody asked us......but the sheeple just keep moaning and voting for the parties that just open the borders to all and sundry.
"Typical left wing bull shit" was not insulting you personally, was it?
Although "Says Thick Mick from Patcham." and " was it you fool? Typical bullshit from a dunce NSC poster."........was.
Here you go:
Maybe I should have added "for jobs" at the end to make it totally utterly clear but I think in the context it is clear enough.
Utter rubbish and you know it, I suppose we are all to "thick" to try and work out which context your posting, lets not forget your context's change with the weather, to suit your latest rant.
Utter rubbish and you know it, I suppose we are all to "thick" to try and work out which context your posting, lets not forget your context's change with the weather, to suit your latest rant.
I suppose we are all to "thick" to try and work out which context your posting,
Yep, it changes, or the points are body swerved. A tactic, with insulting, that are the usual traits of a certain political persuasion.
I was not swerving you, more gave up on you for rambling on about arrest rates when I wanted to see some conviction rates. You're not a criminal until you are convicted. Unless I am mistaken these were not provided so I moved on.
They show the nationality of criminals ‘PROCEEDED against’ – either CHARGED and taken to court, FINED or CAUTIONED – by the force over a year and the nature of the crime. From September 2010 to August 31 2011.
Seeing as there are over 500,000 Poles, and only about 68,000 Romanians, the percentage does change dramatically.
I'm sorry i can not provide more up to date info atm, maybe seeing as you are the one doubting, you could produce the convicted list.
![]()
What does accused mean though? I could accuse you of theft, not that I will, but you must be able to see my point? Publishing these ambiguous stats is dangerous in my opinion. I am going out for a beer and some food now but will look for some more meaningful figures later or tomorrow. Have a good evening.
What does accused mean though? I could accuse you of theft, not that I will, but you must be able to see my point? Publishing these ambiguous stats is dangerous in my opinion. I am going out for a beer and some food now but will look for some more meaningful figures later or tomorrow. Have a good evening.
Yes they did ask you. UKIP offered an opportunity to close the borders at the last election and the Tories will offer an in/out referendum at the next election and I presume UKIP will again. If the nation wants this they have two options to achieve it.
Here you go:
Maybe I should have added "for jobs" at the end to make it totally utterly clear but I think in the context it is clear enough.
that's four.