symyjym
Banned
I think people are cancelling en mass anyway. They have been trying to plug the 2 months for the price of one to try and get people to re-subscribe.
Would be good to know how many have cancelled.
I think people are cancelling en mass anyway. They have been trying to plug the 2 months for the price of one to try and get people to re-subscribe.
Well obviously it shouldn't be necessary, but I have been there to help sort things out when needed. On my watch we have had the occasional late start but in general the commentaries have gone OK. Many regulars here on Saturday will confirm that.
Would be good to know how many have cancelled.
But it would have gone tits up on a lot more occasions without your intervention.
But it would have gone tits up on a lot more occasions without your intervention.
this is right
in the early days when it was very bad but for the intervention of Uncle C we would not have had any commentary
last week I asked the insider on "ask the club" for the 3rd time and said, probably wrongly,(and was banned) that "heads should roll" and was politely told by one of the moderators that the infraction was because of this remark and that it was advocating one of his colleagues getting the sack.
IMHO this shows that maybe insider is to close to these colleagues and also it might take a mass evacuation of "Player" to make someone see that they cannot keep serving up a shite service.
since last week I have told "Player" to go where the sun don't shine and have had more than a few emails asking me to re-start it (they must be getting desperate)
pity they never answered some of MY emails asking them to supply the service that I paid for.
the pity is the interviews and highlights are shorter on the youtube
but I will cope.
was it too much to ask the club to step in after all it is called "Seagulls Player"
I STUCK MY HEAD ON THE LINE BECAUSE WHILE WE LIVED IN WALES IT WAS MY ONLY LINK TO THE ALBION.
now we have moved down here to Eastbourne I can listen to it on my brand new DAB radio(kindly supplied by my Granddaughter) but I feel for all those Albion fans who live far and wide who have to put up with this useless service
Thethis is right
in the early days when it was very bad but for the intervention of Uncle C we would not have had any commentary
last week I asked the insider on "ask the club" for the 3rd time and said, probably wrongly,(and was banned) that "heads should roll" and was politely told by one of the moderators that the infraction was because of this remark and that it was advocating one of his colleagues getting the sack.
IMHO this shows that maybe insider is to close to these colleagues and also it might take a mass evacuation of "Player" to make someone see that they cannot keep serving up a shite service.
since last week I have told "Player" to go where the sun don't shine and have had more than a few emails asking me to re-start it (they must be getting desperate)
pity they never answered some of MY emails asking them to supply the service that I paid for.
the pity is the interviews and highlights are shorter on the youtube
but I will cope.
was it too much to ask the club to step in after all it is called "Seagulls Player"
I STUCK MY HEAD ON THE LINE BECAUSE WHILE WE LIVED IN WALES IT WAS MY ONLY LINK TO THE ALBION.
now we have moved down here to Eastbourne I can listen to it on my brand new DAB radio(kindly supplied by my Granddaughter) but I feel for all those Albion fans who live far and wide who have to put up with this useless service
Thanks Glasfryn
I too was banned a while ago for a similar offence of protesting too much, but apparently calling someone a c*u*n*t is OK.
As the Yanks would say 'go figure'.
This is what was said
" you ****ing **** the C In your user name is obviously c u n t....... F u c k i n g T w at is what I meant is that ok just in case you or uncle c u n t didn't get it"
Theand
emoticons might have been a better alternative to "heads should roll"
![]()
trouble is he is not aits all the others in the pipeline forget to do this or that and my comment was not aimed at him HE tries his best but if others are not listening then what more can he do.
what the chance eventually that the BBC might give up the ghost and give it to a company that can do the job.
IMHO the BBC are going downhill fast even on the TV side since they have moved they have become very shoddy
Thewas aimed at the muppet(s) who is/are clearly not doing their job(s) properly and it reflects badly on the club who keep apologising when external parties screw it up , other club's version of Player works perfectly and we want the same standard of service.
I had it for years
complaining is useless
you have it as it is
or get rid like I have
and be careful about putting anything on "ask the club" I was banned after asking 3 times and finally I lost it
not fit for purpose I am afraid
this was exactly who I aimed my comments at with my post on ask the club but someone took exception(would be nice to know exactly who) I have said the bit about reflecting badly on the club but it seems that people are listening(insider) but the people he is telling are cocking a deaf one.
The Wigan commentary didn't seem to have any problems at all which suggests the issue is the stream from BBC Sussex rather than Player. Not sure anything the club can do - isn't the contract with the football league?