Man U

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊







bigc

New member
Jul 5, 2003
5,740
bugger.

they will go top of the league for the first time since January 2004.
 




Bakesy

Farting for ENGLAND!!!
Feb 13, 2005
9,667
How would i know?I'm pissed.
Yes, but has Ronaldo been sithed down yet?
 
















bigc

New member
Jul 5, 2003
5,740
clapham_gull said:
Its pay per view.

I've a feeling that Man United will push Chelsea for the title.

I dunno, scoring a lot of goals against a crap Fulham side has never counted for anything.
 








DTES

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
6,022
London
"Terribly Quiet, Isn't It?" says Alan Green, commentating on 5Live.

4-1 up before half time, at home. On the first day of the season, and there's no noise.

Who says Man United have prawn-sandwich eating fans?
 


1

1066gull

Guest
DTES said:
"Terribly Quiet, Isn't It?" says Alan Green, commentating on 5Live.

4-1 up before half time, at home. On the first day of the season, and there's no noise.

Who says Man United have prawn-sandwich eating fans?
I hate matches like this. I like noise and an atmosphere
 
Last edited:




Wilko

LUZZING chairs about
Sep 19, 2003
9,929
BN1
From the BBC website:

44 mins: Have 70-odd thousand people all gathered in one place ever been so quiet? Despite United's total dominance, the atmosphere is reminiscent of a library reading room.

:lolol:
 






Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,795
Location Location
clapham_gull said:
Its pay per view.

I've a feeling that Man United will push Chelsea for the title.
Based on what ?
They've still not replaced the horse, and I can't see the likes of Saha/Solskjaer or Smith getting enough goals to hang on to Chelseas coat-tails.

Carrick was a good signing (abeit at a ludicrous price), but overall Man U have a weaker squad than last year, while Chelsea are significantly stronger.

A 5-1 win against one of the relegation candidates changes nothing.
 
Last edited:






Les Biehn

GAME OVER
Aug 14, 2005
20,610
Easy 10 said:
Based on what ?
They've still not replaced the horse, and I can't see the likes of Saha/Solskjaer or Smith getting enough goals to hang on to Chelseas coat-tails.

Carrick was a good signing (abeit at a ludicrous price), but overall Man U have a weaker squad than last year, while Chelsea are significantly stronger.

A 5-1 win against one of the relegation candidates changes nothing.

Got to agree with that. Fulham are dire plus Man Ure always bully the shit teams but never get results like that against any half decent sides.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top