brightonmark1234
Well-known member
i feel he should of got then 10 games
Well obviously I know it wasn't because he was black. The rule that you can't give a retrospective ban is ridiculous though.He was booked so they couldn't take retrospective action. But I guess you knew that was the reason for it rather than him being black.
But zero games banned if you bite someone but you're black - then it's ok.
Suarez has plenty of previous, therefore he can hardly claim previous good behaviour as a mitigating factor. Essentially his case was 'yes I was stupid, but I have apologised and donated some money to charity.' He has already served a 7 game ban for an almost identical offence, so he can hardly claim innocence.
On that basis alone, I can't say I am surprised at the outcome.
I don't see that 10 games is harsh. The Dutch FA banned him for 7 matches for his first biting offence and he's gone and done it again, so you'd expect the punishment for the second incident to be more severe, which it is.
For once I think the FA have got this right - they've basically said you can have your seven-game ban for biting plus three games on top for doing it again.
Well obviously I know it wasn't because he was black. The rule that you can't give a retrospective ban is ridiculous though.
Honestly, I'm stagged Liverpool are shocked by this. If they appeal they are morons.
Just accept he ****ed up and move on.
how do we know he wont do it again
I don't see that 10 games is harsh. The Dutch FA banned him for 7 matches for his first biting offence and he's gone and done it again, so you'd expect the punishment for the second incident to be more severe, which it is.
For once I think the FA have got this right - they've basically said you can have your seven-game ban for biting plus three games on top for doing it again.
It gets better.
We should remove our players from the England set up, they are trying to destroy us.
#prayforliverpool
Absolutely absurd reaction from the FA and according to them they are unable to take retrospective action if the ref saw anything and decided to take no action, but it suits them to take action this time. Would the same action have been taken against Evra, Welbeck or Defoe had they done it, I doubt it very much.