He scores less than a goal every 4 games, when being supplied with LOTS of chances in a really GOOD team. Oof.
Fixed for you.
He scores less than a goal every 4 games, when being supplied with LOTS of chances in a really GOOD team. Oof.
That's what happens when you don't get to play football. At West Ham he was directly behind Andy Carroll, and there's no shame in that. What Chamakh needs is a bit of confidence back and Ian Holloway, while not tactically the best, can certainly supply confidence in abundance.
If Palace sign Darren Bent too, they've got a very good chance of survival IMO.
He scores less than a goal every 4 games. Oof.
You owe a charity money. That's my response to anything you post.
Of course? That doesn't mean that Leo is a bad player, he's just not as good as Chamakh. Chamakh played for 8 years for a top side in the French top division, scoring regularly in the Champions League. In his first three months at Arsenal he scored 10 goals. After that, Van Persie came back from injury and obviously Marouane found his chances limited.
Of course? That doesn't mean that Leo is a bad player, he's just not as good as Chamakh. Chamakh played for 8 years for a top side in the French top division, scoring regularly in the Champions League. In his first three months at Arsenal he scored 10 goals. After that, Van Persie came back from injury and obviously Marouane found his chances limited.
How come he didn't go to United, or Chelsea, or Spurs? Was it that Arsenal didn't want to hand their title rivals such a MASSIVE advantage?
You owe money to a charity. Scum.
Because he wasn't good enough for Arsenal, United, Chelsea or Spurs? What part of "he's a good player but not good enough for a top Premier League club" did you not understand?
I'm sure he'll do well this year for Palace and his potential partnership with Darren Bent could be good to watch.
How come you're not on the BBS anymore pal?![]()
Because he wasn't good enough for Arsenal, United, Chelsea or Spurs? What part of "he's a good player but not good enough for a top Premier League club" did you not understand?
I'm sure he'll do well this year for Palace and his potential partnership with Darren Bent could be good to watch.
How come you're not on the BBS anymore pal?![]()
This thread would be more humourous if the player was actually that bad.
However, he is not. He just wasn't up to the standard of Arsenal (who are a very very good champions league club, despite the 'fashionable' stance of criticising them)
Palace may have pulled off an excellent signing there. Rivitalised and ready to prove a point. Get Bolasie swining a cross onto his head and that wont be easy to defend against?
Will he set the footballing world alight? Probably not.
Is it a hilarious signing? No way.
If he can't play well with the players Arsenal have then he isn't going to do much for you. Better players make other players look good.
Does this mean the £8m non league player wouldn't be starting for the Barcelona of South London ?
It means that the £6m player who did well in the Championship last year will be playing alongside Chamakh, unless Bent signs at which point he'll find himself on the bench I'd imagine.
When your promotion has made you a minimum of £120m, you can afford to take a risk on a very promising young player.
HaHa you really are a deluded ****. Nice that you have to spend all your time on our forum and even make up several user names to post the same drivel.
. He is absolutely 100% good enough for the Premier League, I really don't see how anyone could look at his career and say that he isn't better than any striker in the Championship.
Presumably that includes the ones like Johnson, Zamora and Holt whose own Premiership records are comfortably better?
It means that the £6m player who did well in the Championship last year will be playing alongside Chamakh, unless Bent signs at which point he'll find himself on the bench I'd imagine.
When your promotion has made you a minimum of £120m, you can afford to take a risk on a very promising young player.