Have you ever been banned from NSC? Or picked up any Infractions?

[Bry Nylon]

...and if "yes", what for?

After all these years I still have a clean licence.

 

[Kazenga <3]

Yes. One for claiming [MENTION=16483]SirElliotBennett[/MENTION] tosser: ) was a sex pervert and again for writing 'test'.

 

[TottonSeagull]

Yep, for calling Public School Boy .....Pubic Small Toy. Got me a 3pt infraction!

 

[Titus]

Of course not. How very dare you!

 

[Stat Brother]

Yes, for an incredibly stupid, thoughtless, thread.


Posted with he best of intentions but so wrong diddly wrong wrong

 

[Deleted User X18H]

I did for saying I went to Gus' Thursday morning press conference, when I erm.......went to Gus' Thursday morning press conference.

I am hoping to go this coming Thursday , but won't mention it just in case.

 

[Muzzy]

Nope, I'm cleaner than a nuns clunge.

Or I'm just a boring ****?

Replies neither wanted or warranted, thanks

 

[7:18]

I'm a good boy

 

[TheMajor]

Infraction for wishing someone would snap that f*cker Z**a's leg in two. (I still can't see what was wrong with it).

 

[Ninja Elephant]

I did for saying I went to Gus' Thursday morning press conference, when I erm.......went to Gus' Thursday morning press conference.

I am hoping to go this coming Thursday , but won't mention it just in case.

I must have missed that. Was the ban mentioned at all, at the time?

So far, I am yet to do anything to warrant a ban or an infraction.

 

[brakespear]

I don't think I've had either.

 

[Sussax]

Nope.

 

[Cheshire Cat]

 

[Bozza]

Brilliant. I really need this thread. Thanks Bry.

 

[hans kraay fan club]

Yes. One for claiming [MENTION=16483]SirElliotBennett[/MENTION] tosser: ) was a sex pervert and again for writing 'test'.

Yep, for calling Public School Boy .....Pubic Small Toy. Got me a 3pt infraction!

Infraction for wishing someone would snap that f*cker Z**a's leg in two. (I still can't see what was wrong with it).

Why would you think it was okay, or sensible to repeat the very things, that were deemed unacceptable previously?

 

[bennibenj]

Brilliant. I really need this thread. Thanks Bry.

Seems to be a lot of stirring last couple days.

Guys/Gals - best just leave this stuff alone, really is there any point to stoking the fire??

 

[Bry Nylon]

Brilliant. I really need this thread. Thanks Bry.

I believe you banned yourself once? Can't recall what for though.

Anyway, please delete this thread if it has the potential to be problematic. No worries, although I believed it would be cathartic - openness normally heals divisions

 

[beorhthelm]

i received an infraction bit of a spleen vent, apparently because it had some swearing. theres plenty of swearing and ive said worse, but you only get infractions if you are reported. so i summise that some ares hat couldnt take it and cried a bit.

 

[Bry Nylon]

Why would you think it was okay, or sensible to repeat the very things, that were deemed unacceptable previously?

So why have you just quoted them ALL again?

Box missing blunt tool.

 

[Kazenga <3]

Why would you think it was okay, or sensible to repeat the very things, that were deemed unacceptable previously?

Its in moderating decisions anyway? Besides both of those lack the context as to why they deserved a banning and contain nothing explicit or controversial.