Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Anything to de-humanise them. No empathy required.Quite correct, I call them Unauthorised Aliens![]()
Anything to de-humanise them. No empathy required.Quite correct, I call them Unauthorised Aliens![]()
More clicks = more money for her fair play but people really should stop falling for her stunts.Anyone notice she was flown home?
Yep including the fabulous Dublin Agreement which saw how many returned under that arrangementThe picture posted isn't totally correct is it ?. Entering the UK without authorisation is an offence under the Immigration Act 1971, Section 24. That said, the legal status of those who do, is that they have a right to claim asylum and have the government assess them.
We've all done this dance before though haven't we ?
I suspect the information is available.Point of interest, what percentage seek asylum on arrival and what percentage disappear into the country as soon as they arrive?
In what way can one fall?More clicks = more money for her fair play but people really should stop falling for her stunts.
1. North of 90%Point of interest, what percentage seek asylum on arrival and what percentage disappear into the country as soon as they arrive?
What's your point?Anyone notice she was flown home?
Guessing that as she is trying to draw attention to climate change, she should have swum.What's your point?
Maybe (and i can’t be certain nor do i have a view personally) they were suggesting she got her photo opportunity, spread the message and got the f*** out of Dodge?What's your point?
Im not sure people being deported get much choice. I don't suppose the people sent to El Salvador from the US could opt for a Disney cruise as their transportation of choice.Guessing that as she is trying to draw attention to climate change, she should have swum.
I must be missing something here because I’m not sure the what the thread connection is between a legal protest by Greta and Human Rights NGOs and undocumented migrants crossing the channel and seeking asylum and being rescued from sinking boats?Just wanted to make the point
Boat was safely afloat, all souls on board wanted to enter Gaza to deliver aid and were denied. So entering Gaza would be illegal and they were deported
Boats across the channel are unsafe, the people are refugees with the intention of entering the UK to claim asylum. It is not illegal. That's why they are not arrested or deported. So calling them illegal immigrants is factually incorrect.
Yep. Everything about Great Thunberg screams, "trying to make money and build up a massive personal wealth"More clicks = more money for her
Well we know that 17k at least are "missing" even the Guardian says that.
![]()
Home Office ‘loses’ 17,000 people whose asylum claims were withdrawn
Tory MP queries claims marked withdrawn as government tries to clear backlog by end of yearwww.theguardian.com
And all Greta was offered was a sandwich and the chance to watch a video nasty , which she respectfully declined .1. North of 90%
2. Those claiming Asylum will be given a phone and registered, then be moved to accommodation where they await their decision, many are out working in the Black Economy though which is abhorrent
I have no problem with the rest of your post - but as @Javeaseagull indicates, what you're describing here is 'piracy'. Israel and their allies may view this as 'legal' - but then of course they would. The flotilla is of no threat to Israel and all occupants were unarmed.I must be missing something here because I’m not sure the thread connection between a legal protest by Greta and Human Rights NGOs in international waters and undocumented migrants crossing the channel and seeking asylum and being rescued from sinking boats .
As you say, neither are ‘illegal’ - nor is rescuing migrants - the only legal act in these two scenarios is by Israel for incepting and commandeering crew and boat flying under a British flag in international waters - so not sure the reason for the comparison?
Edit - just to add, even if Greta & crew had got through the blockade, it’s a matter of opinion that landing in Gaza would be illegal.
The Blockade is illegal, Israel are occupying Gaza illegally and have no legal right to prevent Gazan refugees from receiving aid delivered directly to Gaza from the Med or air by international relief efforts without crossing/landing in Israel or using Israel’s airspace.
I’m sure you have a link (a reliable one) which shows this.1. North of 90%
2. Those claiming Asylum will be given a phone and registered, then be moved to accommodation where they await their decision, many are out working in the Black Economy though which is abhorrent
Including the French MEP, Rima Hassan, who went with her, and refused to sign the waiver? She is now a prisoner.Yep. Everything about Great Thunberg screams, "trying to make money and build up a massive personal wealth"
A prisoner that was kidnapped in International waters, taken to Israel and refused to sign a document to say she had entered illegally.Including the French MEP, Rima Hassan, who went with her, and refused to sign the waiver? She is now a prisoner.