Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[News] Greta Thunberg and the boat









nevergoagain

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2005
1,897
nowhere near Burgess Hill
The picture posted isn't totally correct is it ?. Entering the UK without authorisation is an offence under the Immigration Act 1971, Section 24. That said, the legal status of those who do, is that they have a right to claim asylum and have the government assess them.

We've all done this dance before though haven't we ?
 


Chicken Run

Member Since Jul 2003
NSC Patron
Jul 17, 2003
21,147
The picture posted isn't totally correct is it ?. Entering the UK without authorisation is an offence under the Immigration Act 1971, Section 24. That said, the legal status of those who do, is that they have a right to claim asylum and have the government assess them.

We've all done this dance before though haven't we ?
Yep including the fabulous Dublin Agreement which saw how many returned under that arrangement 🤦

 






Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
61,064
Faversham
Point of interest, what percentage seek asylum on arrival and what percentage disappear into the country as soon as they arrive?
I suspect the information is available.
Have you tried searching on the internet?
 




Chicken Run

Member Since Jul 2003
NSC Patron
Jul 17, 2003
21,147
Point of interest, what percentage seek asylum on arrival and what percentage disappear into the country as soon as they arrive?
1. North of 90%
2. Those claiming Asylum will be given a phone and registered, then be moved to accommodation where they await their decision, many are out working in the Black Economy though which is abhorrent
 






Commander

Arrogant Prat
NSC Patron
Apr 28, 2004
14,226
London






Papa Lazarou

Living in a De Zerbi wonderland
Jul 7, 2003
19,792
Worthing
Guessing that as she is trying to draw attention to climate change, she should have swum.
Im not sure people being deported get much choice. I don't suppose the people sent to El Salvador from the US could opt for a Disney cruise as their transportation of choice.
 


Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
8,958
Just wanted to make the point

Boat was safely afloat, all souls on board wanted to enter Gaza to deliver aid and were denied. So entering Gaza would be illegal and they were deported

Boats across the channel are unsafe, the people are refugees with the intention of entering the UK to claim asylum. It is not illegal. That's why they are not arrested or deported. So calling them illegal immigrants is factually incorrect.
I must be missing something here because I’m not sure the what the thread connection is between a legal protest by Greta and Human Rights NGOs and undocumented migrants crossing the channel and seeking asylum and being rescued from sinking boats?

As you say, neither are ‘illegal’ - nor is rescuing migrants - the only illegal act in these two scenarios is by Israel for intercepting and commandeering a crew & boat flying under a British flag in international waters.

Edit - just to add, even if Greta & crew had got through the blockade, it’s a matter of opinion that landing in Gaza would be illegal.

The Blockade of sea, land and air to Gaza is illegal. Israel are occupying the Gazan enclave illegally. They have no legal right to prevent Gazan refugees from receiving aid delivered directly to Gaza by international relief efforts who are not crossing/landing in the State of Israel or using Israel’s airspace to deliver it.

YES I know it was ‘piracy’ - my post contained a typo ‘legal’ now corrected in bold!
 
Last edited:


Javeaseagull

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 22, 2014
3,052
It was Piracy. They were 100 kilometres from Gaza in International Waters. That is Piracy in anyones book. They were detained, taken to Israel and charged with entering the country illegally. Really! They were taken ashore, from International waters and charged with entering illegally. The Israelis think they are above the law and the way they are behaving towards Palestinians they must be. Any word or criticism is met with screams of “Anti-semetism.” It’s pathetic.
 






carlzeiss

Well-known member
May 19, 2009
6,478
Amazonia
Well we know that 17k at least are "missing" even the Guardian says that.


1. North of 90%
2. Those claiming Asylum will be given a phone and registered, then be moved to accommodation where they await their decision, many are out working in the Black Economy though which is abhorrent
And all Greta was offered was a sandwich and the chance to watch a video nasty , which she respectfully declined .
 


:J)

Active member
Jul 7, 2003
664
Brighton
I must be missing something here because I’m not sure the thread connection between a legal protest by Greta and Human Rights NGOs in international waters and undocumented migrants crossing the channel and seeking asylum and being rescued from sinking boats .

As you say, neither are ‘illegal’ - nor is rescuing migrants - the only legal act in these two scenarios is by Israel for incepting and commandeering crew and boat flying under a British flag in international waters - so not sure the reason for the comparison?

Edit - just to add, even if Greta & crew had got through the blockade, it’s a matter of opinion that landing in Gaza would be illegal.

The Blockade is illegal, Israel are occupying Gaza illegally and have no legal right to prevent Gazan refugees from receiving aid delivered directly to Gaza from the Med or air by international relief efforts without crossing/landing in Israel or using Israel’s airspace.
I have no problem with the rest of your post - but as @Javeaseagull indicates, what you're describing here is 'piracy'. Israel and their allies may view this as 'legal' - but then of course they would. The flotilla is of no threat to Israel and all occupants were unarmed.

Here's a BBC article describing how Israel deemed their raid of the Free Gaza Flotilla way back in May 2010 killing nine crew - as perfectly legal. Note the framing of the story by the BBC. The Israeli inquiry judgement is up front and centre, whilst the separate UN Inquiry, saying that the Israeli Navy had shown an "unacceptable level of brutality" is only mentioned fleetingly.

Israel consider their blockade of aid for Gaza as perfectly legal and moral etc, as they have done since the early '90s. And their US, British and European allies don't seem to disagree.
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
1. North of 90%
2. Those claiming Asylum will be given a phone and registered, then be moved to accommodation where they await their decision, many are out working in the Black Economy though which is abhorrent
I’m sure you have a link (a reliable one) which shows this.
 




Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
Yep. Everything about Great Thunberg screams, "trying to make money and build up a massive personal wealth"
Including the French MEP, Rima Hassan, who went with her, and refused to sign the waiver? She is now a prisoner.
 


nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
19,330
Gods country fortnightly
Including the French MEP, Rima Hassan, who went with her, and refused to sign the waiver? She is now a prisoner.
A prisoner that was kidnapped in International waters, taken to Israel and refused to sign a document to say she had entered illegally.


NOTE 3: It is hereby clarified that Israel's Territorial Sea extends 12 nm from the baseline, in accordance with Israel's domestic laws and with customary international maritime law.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here