pasty
A different kind of pasty
I would normally agree with that, but in this instance, NO WAY does Buckley come under the heading "expendable"
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Fulham may move for Buckley
- Thread starter Rambo
- Start date
I would normally agree with that, but in this instance, NO WAY does Buckley come under the heading "expendable"
Behind Enemy Lines
Well-known member
Well said. Very difficult to replace.
brightn'ove
cringe
Ninja Elephant
Doctor Elephant
- Feb 16, 2009
- 18,855
usual attention seeking post
No it isn't, a lot of people feel the same.
He isn't irreplacable, £4million minimum price for me too. I would rather we kept him, obviously, but if we choose to sell we should get the best possible fee.
Jim Van Winkle
Well-known member
Agreed. I'd say he is more inconsistent than overrated though.
Bennett or Buckley? Bennett.
Are you on crack? Or just a bit simple?
BensGrandad
New member
Why? It seems a logical move both them, and him if they beat Watford.
Jim Van Winkle
Well-known member
@BensGrandad - Going to either Watford or Palace in the EPL is still a sideways (or even a backwards move) in the long run. Lets face it whichever team goes up they are coming straight back down. The only players either team will be buying are journeyman cloggers and cast-off youth players from the top five/six teams.
Publius Ovidius
Well-known member
Good luck to them on that then. Buckley is a decent player, but not consisten or fit enough for the premiershite
seagullsovergrimsby
#cpfctinpotclub
Only if they're prepared to pay £10M for him.
supaseagull
Well-known member
No can't see it happening
BensGrandad
New member
I can for about £3-4m giving us a healthy profit. All depends on who the new manager turns out to be and his outlook on the game and future plans.
Barn Door Billy
New member
BensGrandad
New member
Wrong again, it must be difficult continually being wrong. This has not been suggested by any experts or site it is just a view that I hold that could possibly happen.
Barn Door Billy
New member
From www.football-rumours.co.uk
17 May 2013 13:16:33
If palace are promoted, they are likely to sign Brighton winger Will Buckley in order to fillets hole left by Wilf's absence
So yes, it has been suggested on that wonderful site. And as for the childish comeback of me being 'continually wrong', may I remind you that it is you who has many times referred to the aforementioned site (on which almost everything posted is wrong) and you who have suggested that we would willingly sell one of our stars (and he would willingly go) to our greatest rivals.
BensGrandad
New member
I missed that on football rumours so I apologise for my error but I do think it could happen and the fact that they are our rivals doesnt enter into it if they are in the Premier and we get an acceptable price. Players have moved between the two clubs in the past and will in the future.
seagullsovergrimsby
#cpfctinpotclub
"fillets hole" , do they mean to fill a hole or are they in a chippy ordering 2 fillets of sole ?
Meade's Ball
Well-known member
I'd be most sorry to see the back of Buckles, probably like so many fullbacks do too. His touch and his crossing are both great and he has his sly little bursts of pace with the occasional flick are on occasion immaculate and obscene. Ideally his full fitness will have returned and he has the confidence to absolutely tear at defences again. I don't want him gone and to give up his sublime love-affair with the silky baldness of the Bruno. They're a killer pair.
SIMMO SAYS
Well-known member
There isn't a player anywhere who is not irreplaceable so that is stating the bleeding obvious.
@Mustafa said £3 million plus and you said £4 million minimum 'too' so what is it?
To get the best possible fee is stating the bleeding obvious.
And how many is this 'lot of people feel the same'.