- Oct 17, 2008
- 17,485
I enjoyed it a lot. Beginning is not the best but the last 90 minutes, is some excellent actionMission Impossible The Final Reckoning
It rates a 91 out of 100 . Amazing
Tom Cruise is a complete nutcase that stunt on the plane was all real, ok he had cables to hold him on, obviously not shown but quite incredible and at age 62
Tom seems to have bulked out for this he is a beast and for me Tom Cruise has never made a bad film. Quite frankly he is BOX OFFICE
Mission Impossible The Final Reckoning
It rates a 91 out of 100 . Amazing
Tom Cruise is a complete nutcase that stunt on the plane was all real, ok he had cables to hold him on, obviously not shown but quite incredible and at age 62
Tom seems to have bulked out for this he is a beast and for me Tom Cruise has never made a bad film. Quite frankly he is BOX OFFICE
It for me was great from start to finish I know Kermode said part 1 was slow but parts 2 and 3 were stunning. The submarine and flying scenes were perfection. For me it was the best of the 8 films from a pretty high bar. This is good to see like Final Destination 6 was also the best of the franchise. RefreshingI enjoyed it a lot. Beginning is not the best but the last 90 minutes, is some excellent action
Top Gun Maverick was also insanely good and far better than Top GunI think he’s a quality actor and I love all the Mission Impossible movies.
Top Gun Maverick was also insanely good and far better than Top Gun
Top Gun Maverick is so much better. A really great filmI haven’t seen it yet, on my wish list. I didn’t really like the original, over hyped.
Sad to hear mate, best for me close to next best rogue nationMission Impossible
I have enjoyed quite a few of these films. Not so much this one.
The action pieces are few and far between. So much of the plot is told through talking / exposition.
Deathly dull throwbacks to some of the earlier films. Mostly done through conversation.
I dozed off a few times.
The stunts are okay. Not great.
I like Tom Cruise and this isn’t a stinker but it’s verging on it.
Not for me.
Yeah, just didn’t do it for me. Glad I saw it at the cinema though. I’ve enjoyed the franchise as a whole.Sad to hear mate, best for me close to next best rogue nation
Each to their own mate, respectYeah, just didn’t do it for me. Glad I saw it at the cinema though. I’ve enjoyed the franchise as a whole.
I really enjoyed the last one. With the motorbike / train stunt.
There is that argument. But also, cinemas were on their arse 15 yrs ago.Depressing how many movies on this thread are sequels or prequels or infinite varieties of Marvel Universe shit.
Ultimately it spells the death of cinema![]()
Or you could look at it from another perspective - if you have an interesting character/situation/concept, or a wide story, why restrict it to one long film when you could have more than one, going deeper and less superficial? Many books are part of series looking deeper into characters or storylines, and ultimately it gives more choice and less frustration along the lines of "I wish I knew what happened next" or "how did they get to this point". And you don't hear people worried about the death of fiction when a sequel comes out in popular book series.Depressing how many movies on this thread are sequels or prequels or infinite varieties of Marvel Universe shit.
Ultimately it spells the death of cinema![]()
Watching John Wick Is Pain.