Bars Mar
Registered Drug User
Another Spot On Post By The Nsc King Of SpotOnNess. Well Said Gav As Always.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Can you get anymore disrespectful??
- Thread starter pseudonym
- Start date
SK1NT
Well-known member
Totally disagree... this is disgracful. I am shocked anyone is defending him. If he can be so emotionless, and disrespectful to a dead body it makes me wonder what other situations in life he may be equally as insensative with...
Plus this is just one picture we have seen... who know what other stuff he may have done if thats the stuff he's photographing...
He just a f***ed up prick... end of...
SK1NT
Well-known member
Just as i thought.... a normal law obiding, caring person is very unlikely to take pictures of a decapitated dead bod...
Meade's Ball
Well-known member
Perhaps the head he's holding is almost identical to his own, apart from it being attached to a body. You'd have to take a photo of such an event.
Someone might get offended, and that is a shame, but hopefully they won't and it's just some prat doing something stupid which he'll be told off for.
Someone might get offended, and that is a shame, but hopefully they won't and it's just some prat doing something stupid which he'll be told off for.
Bad Ash
Unregistered User
The part of the article mentioning that he lived with a cross-dresser and refers to a bloke in a wig shouting was all rather bizzare, and not entirely necessary.
Randsta
New member
Could have been worst his c**k could have been in its mouth! leave a nasty taste
Monsieur Le Plonk
Lethargy in motion
I'm with US and others in that this is morally indefensible and fecking revolting. He is laughing whilst holding the head of someones recently deceased relative!! How the bejeesus can you defend him taking a picture?
Foster House
New member
I think it is wrong, even to take such a picture for private use, but....
1) How did the Daily Mail get hold of the picture?
2) Why should the man's partner be named, as well as his dressing habits?
3) Why take a leading quote from a neighbour?
It's a rotten national newspaper with less standards and values than the man in the picture that wishes to re-enforce the prejudices of its core readers.
1) How did the Daily Mail get hold of the picture?
2) Why should the man's partner be named, as well as his dressing habits?
3) Why take a leading quote from a neighbour?
It's a rotten national newspaper with less standards and values than the man in the picture that wishes to re-enforce the prejudices of its core readers.
- Thread starter
- #51
Them that defend this moron are missing the point, it's not about people being easily offended or it's a gruesome job so he has to do something that helps him remove ones self to help cope, it's about respect to the deceased and family.
It's strange how many give respect to footballers etc etc for doing a decent thing but find something like this not disrespectful.
It's strange how many give respect to footballers etc etc for doing a decent thing but find something like this not disrespectful.
sten_super
Brain Surgeon
This is a very fair point.
What I disagree with is the need for some kind of public hate campaign. Yes this is disrespectful to the deceased and the family involved. However I am neither - why therefore should I be offended by it? As I've stated already, I am much more offended by the fact that the Daily Mail decided to publish it - on what basis was this decision taken? It clearly isn't about defending public decency - by publishing the story they themselves fail that test. There isn't a 'public interest' defence, given that it's been reported to the relevant authorities and soon he will no doubt not be allowed to practice his profession. It's simply about selling newspapers.
- Thread starter
- #53
It was not just the mail, multi news agency's ran the story. i dislike the mail just like the next person, but this is not about the daily mail.
'It's simply about selling newspapers' well yeah i think thats the general idea, was there a public interest in the media running a story about a stolen ipad? as much as you may dislike it thats todays media and we are stuck with it.
Prof P
New member
- Sep 22, 2004
- 112
Tell you what offends me. Its the stream of moaning pussies who get offended by everything nowadays. Do you spend your little lives totally OUTRAGE by everything you see? I can't believe people spend so much time now complaining to newspapers, moaning, being offended, feeling hurt, boo hoo.
Yes, I appreciate the irony of me complaining about people complaining. But seriously, this county really is being taken over by a load of prissy c~nts.
Its a dead body. Doubt its former occupant could give a shit and neither should you.
Yes, I appreciate the irony of me complaining about people complaining. But seriously, this county really is being taken over by a load of prissy c~nts.
Its a dead body. Doubt its former occupant could give a shit and neither should you.
MattBackHome
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 11,745
I disagree with the moral outrage in this case. Yeah the bloke is a prat, and what he did was ‘disrespectful’. And yes, if it was my relative I would be baying for blood (though if you said that was going to happen to me, provided that no-one would see the pics I wouldn’t particularly care.)
I suppose I feel that people who do that sort of job have to deal with things that many others including myself would find very unpalatable. If they do need to find ways of processing that (i.e. ‘black’ humour, depersonalising etc) then as long as its not hurting anyone else I don’t really feel in a position to be able to judge them.
Having said that, now it’s out, his position should be untenable, and he probably should go.
I suppose I feel that people who do that sort of job have to deal with things that many others including myself would find very unpalatable. If they do need to find ways of processing that (i.e. ‘black’ humour, depersonalising etc) then as long as its not hurting anyone else I don’t really feel in a position to be able to judge them.
Having said that, now it’s out, his position should be untenable, and he probably should go.
Birdie Boy
Well-known member
- Jun 17, 2011
- 4,116
I don't think he will lose his job as it is his own company! However, I do suspect that no local funeral parlours will want to use him so his business will probably go under.
The problem is, if he is doing this sort of thing, what else is he doing with other bodies? Necrophilia comes to mind! Going by the cross-dressers he lives with, I suspect he only plays with the boys and leaves the girls alone!
The problem is, if he is doing this sort of thing, what else is he doing with other bodies? Necrophilia comes to mind! Going by the cross-dressers he lives with, I suspect he only plays with the boys and leaves the girls alone!
Staly
Well-known member
Well, seeing as he's been convicted and imprisoned for stealing jewellery from dead bodies, I doubt that he's still employed in that particular career.
- Thread starter
- #58
MattBackHome
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 11,745
Now that is out of order.
Agree with you mate.
People love to moan or be shocked and offended by something MORE than twenty years ago it seems. This thread is a bit of light relief from the tension on NSC in the last couple of days. Not saying it's nice for the victim's family but there are more important things in life to get upset over.