Calde Red Card

[Beach Hut]

What does NSC think - fair or poor decision ?

Personally (although I would like to see it again) I think the issue was intent and it was there so was probably the right decision.

Oh and Ernest, next time I go through the turnstiles and my bag is searched do not say to the steward there is lube and gay videos in it

 

[JBizzleBeard]

100% red card.

 

[Marc1901]

Very very poor decision. The Charlton player who apparently got caught flew in 2 footed . The ref tonight was a f***ing joke!

 

[Jimmy's gonna get ya!]

Won the ball, but with both feet off the ground....... had to go under current rules.

 

[JBizzle]

Definate red. Two feet and high. Racon made a huge deal of it because there was very little contact but it was a red. Sadly.

 

[theonesmith]

My initial thought was he was lucky to get the ball, or he'd be off. Then I was furious with the decision- as it seemed that Racon decided to fall over a couple of seconds after the challenge and roll around, the ref (seemingly about 5 seconds after the tackle) then decided to send him off.

It wasn't the actual challenge I was annoyed with per se, more the dive and huge delay in the ref making his mind up.

But then again, I may have perceived it wrong, need to see it again.. But I thought he got the ball and it was a good challenge!

 

[JBizzle]

Very very poor decision. The Charlton player who apparently got caught flew in 2 footed . The ref tonight was a f***ing joke!

And yes. The ref was 100% a tosser.

 

[drew]

Very very poor decision. IMO whatever Charlton played that was he flew in with both feet but because he went down and Calde didn't the Spaniard got sent off. The ref tonight was a f***ing joke!

Watch the replays. He jumped in with both feet. Irrespective of whether he got the ball or not he had to go. 20 years ago he would have got away with it but now that is a straight red.

 

[Art Vs Science]

"Oh and Ernest, next time I go through the turnstiles and my bag is searched do not say to the steward there is lube and gay videos in it"

 

[Mr deez]

I thought he hopped over the player, yes with both legs together but entirely meaning to clear him and comfortably doing so. Didn't even think it was a foul or dangerous, but entirely read to be shot down when a replay is out..

 

[JBizzleBeard]

Watch the replays. He jumped in with both feet. Irrespective of whether he got the ball or not he had to go. 20 years ago he would have got away with it but now that is a straight red.

This.

 

[TWOCHOICEStom]

100 per cent red.

the actions of the Charlton player or whoever won the ball is irrelevant.

 

[manilaseagull]

What does NSC think - fair or poor decision ?

Personally (although I would like to see it again) I think the issue was intent and it was there so was probably the right decision.

Oh and Ernest, next time I go through the turnstiles and my bag is searched do not say to the steward there is lube and gay videos in it

surely not video's? maybe dvds?

 

[severnside gull]

choice between Bennett or Kish at right back for the next 3 games? What do we think?

 

[Beach Hut]

choice between Bennett or Kish at right back for the next 3 games? What do we think?

Neither it will be El Bad and Elphick into the centre.

 

[7:18]

definite red, almost sparked a riot between a decent bloke and a knobend in block B, Calde was lucky to get the ball and I thought at first he had gotten away with it. However, he lunged in with two feet and you can't do that, definite red.

 

[Wilko]

Yep, thought it was a red the moment he jumped it. Strange thing to do for Calde though.

 

[7:18]

Neither it will be El Bad and Elphick into the centre.

this

 

[empire]

thought bridcutts two footed challenge first half was worse

 

[deletebeepbeepbeep]

Bridcutt's challenge, was MUCH, MUCH worse. We got away with that.