Seagull58
In the Algarve
You are wrong. I have just done it. As said previously. Go to the schedule and select the 7pm programme.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] 5live now - Albion discussion just started
- Thread starter Weststander
- Start date
You are wrong. I have just done it. As said previously. Go to the schedule and select the 7pm programme.
And, for balance, my late 2020 / early 2021 take on Potter was totally wrong, whereas you called it spot on. We all get things wrong and get things right when it comes to sport.
GT49er
Well-known member
Pity that bit was missing from the earlier posts you quoted. They simply gave a link to the current programme, as I correctly stated. Fortunately, others have given me guidance to enable me to find it without feeling the need to rell me I was wrong.
Seagull58
In the Algarve
Pity that bit was missing from the earlier posts you quoted. They simply gave a link to the current programme, as I correctly stated. Fortunately, others have given me guidance to enable me to find it without feeling the need to rell me I was wrong.
Sorry blud. I was feeling a bit cantankerous. I agree my comment was unnecessary, fam.
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,297
Everything on here is opinions. I’ve lost count of the amount of times I’ve got things wrong or came across wrong. But it’s also nice to occasionally remind people you called something right and it looks right etc. No need for abuse about stroking egos and trying to make people look arrogant who clearly aren’t… if ever I’m negative about a player or the club (which I don’t think is often) I LOVE it when they prove me wrong - as it benifits the Albion. Unfortunately Chris Holdroyd never did this though
brighton_tom
Well-known member
- Jul 23, 2008
- 4,903
Even if its coming with positive sentiments I really cant be bothered with listening to the pundits you get doing the rounds on 5Live/TalkSport etc. When it comes to anyone outside the big 6 their coverage is always so clueless, its like hearing opinions based on seeing some MOTD highlights rather than truly knowing whats going on at BHAFC.
- Thread starter
- #47
Other than Danny Murphy. Every time he talks about us, he genuinely knows his stuff. He seems interested in coaching and the evolution of teams.
Last edited:
B-right-on
Living the dream
Agree - and Danny Mills the exact opposite.
Stato
Well-known member
- Dec 21, 2011
- 6,607
Chappers got one bit wrong there. BDB was fine against Palace. His nightmare came against Wolves and Adama Traore in the first half of the game that turned our season around. He also had a torrid time away at Leicester, but he wasn't alone in that game. I'm glad that we have played them once before James Justin gets back from injury. He was mustard in that game. Maddison also ran riot. He looked a shadow of that player yesterday.
Justice
Dangerous Idiot
This, we all love our club and we will always have different opinions from time to time. When all those different opinions come together and we are having our best ever start in the PL it really doesn’t matter who was right and who was wrong. I’ve been wrong plenty and really don’t give a flying f right nowEverything on here is opinions. I’ve lost count of the amount of times I’ve got things wrong or came across wrong. But it’s also nice to occasionally remind people you called something right and it looks right etc. No need for abuse about stroking egos and trying to make people look arrogant who clearly aren’t… if ever I’m negative about a player or the club (which I don’t think is often) I LOVE it when they prove me wrong - as it benifits the Albion. Unfortunately Chris Holdroyd never did this though
Green Cross Code Man
Wunt be druv
This surely proves Ppf is the biggest spoof account on NSC. Indeed to have a spoof account (PPF) of a satirical account is an accolade.
Yep, good points, they did get the wrong game. Palace only attacked us twice and,.....oh, never mind, let's just hope we exorcise that one on Monday.
Maddison was anonymous on Sunday. Equally I'm hoping when we play Wolves we have both Cucurella and Lamptey fit. Not only will Adama get a lot less change out of those two if he's playing, he'll also be doing way too much defending (or they'll have nice big holes to run into).
Neville's Breakfast
Well-known member
Don't try to whoosh us with you faux naivety
Well, I didn’t know either Harry. Will you take him off ignore now ?
Cheeky Monkey
Well-known member
- Jul 17, 2003
- 23,070
Don't try to whoosh us with you faux naivety
H? Nothing faux about it.
Maybe I haven’t been paying attention...(Confucious reigns and we all got wet)I’d never even heard of this Charlie guy before this thread.
Well, I didn’t know either Harry. Will you take him off ignore now ?
Anyone who thinks a smart young journalist is Das Reich is on drugs. I have a feeling I have stepped into the Twiglet Zone.
(No, no I won't)
H? Nothing faux about it.
I’d never even heard of this Charlie guy before this thread.
OK so Charlie looks like and sounded like a young smart journalist/blogger. He strings sentences together. He can construct an argument based on logic and reasoning. He is as far from Das Reich as it's possible to be (unless you're female, black and pansexual with a cushty desk job and a timeshare in a villa in Jamaica). The 'revelation' that he is Das Reich was, I though, an obvious bit of tomfoolery; just a snigger-trigger. I really thought you were kidding!
Incidentally, did I ever mentioned that I'm directly descended from Pope John Paul? There, I said it.
Neville's Breakfast
Well-known member
[MENTION=21158]Weststander[/MENTION] can you clear this up ? I find myself in the same position as [MENTION=525]Cheeky Monkey[/MENTION] in that I am more interested in the Das Reich thing than the R5 interview.
It's [MENTION=21158]Weststander[/MENTION], you fool!
Edit: I see you fixed it - after a couple of edits. I salute your thoroughness
I am 110% confident Westy was mucking about.
- Thread starter
- #60
I was in the long tradition of nsc …. being silly.
There were clues to this:
- Das Reich wouldn’t appear on the BBC out of ideological principle.
- Charlie Haffenden could string sentences together.
- There no was background noise of burps or knuckles dragging the opium den floor.