No comparison. The sell-on clauses there (such as they were/might have been and whatever other South American multi-ownership chicanery and shennanigans) enabled us to get him cheaper because United pulled out.……..ok
Brighton edging close to deal for IDV starlet Moises Caicedo
Read this news on OneFootball.onefootball.com
The same was reported when Man United were closing in on signing him before multiple ownership concerns.
Yes. Naylor said a while back that his info from the club ( ie Barber ) was that there was a "substantial" sell on.
Every comparison in that both Coventry and Brighton will consider the sell on clauses that both have to pay when deciding whether to accept an offer or not
)
Who would we have to pay the sell-on fee too? For that reason alone, I'm probably out!A new Premier League club is reported to be in the hunt for Gyökeres...
Words that were to the liking of the 25-year-old Swede, who, despite having other offers in his portfolio (Everton and Brighton are still in the race), at this moment even prefers Sporting. And if the forward is close to being convinced, attention is now focused on negotiating with Coventry, which does not lower the bar: €20 million. A number that does not scare the lions who, you know THE BALL, do not rule out the possibility of going a little further...
That, my friend, is why it unanimously wins the ‘most BS transfer story or the window’ award.Selling for £1m and buying back for £20m a few years later might undo a lot of the good reputation in the transfer market we've built up
It strikes me as rather a Chelsea type thing to do, eg Lukaku (and that's gone well!)Selling for £1m and buying back for £20m a few years later might undo a lot of the good reputation in the transfer market we've built up
They can ask, but they won't get it. Expecting a buying club to pay over the odds to cover sell on promises you have made is, I believe, referred to as 'The Zaha Fallacy'.
Coventry will try to get the highest fee they can squeeze out of the purchaser, whether there's a sell-on fee or not - obviously. Ridiculous to think they'd do anything else!
But it may well affect their thinking when deciding to accept a bid or not; the "you would have to be an idiot to say no" ceiling would be higher.
Possibly. My post was just a cheap jibe at Palace.
A sell on is typically on the revenue over the original fee. So if Cucurella was sold for £30m, we get nothing.
Also, ‘imminent’ outgoing with with either Connolly or Zeqiri to replace him at Coventry? Having had so much success with Gyokeres, surely they’ll be back for more?
