I think if he put his 'johnson' on display in front of the Albion Ladies team during shower time, then yes, he would be out of there,...... these issues are obviously more subtle than that.... therefore more care and preparation required, due process.
Don't be daft, when you are under a suspension, and being threatened with all sorts of disciplinary procedure, the best thing to do is swan off on three overseas trips, not have any communication via email, smart phone, facebook, twitter etc etc,.. then come back and immerse yourself in BBC...
No, there are dozens and dozens of LMA statements I have read and heard over the years, all have supported the client against the club/fa etc.... its not unusual, its not unique, its very normal.......
What bloody truth,... there is nothing out in the public domain yet,... his union says one thing, the club say something slightly different,...I back the clubs stance, you do what you want.
just look at the polls,.... 75% back the club, not Gus,.....whilst every view is encouraged, I believe the club wouldn't spend this long compiling its case, then be prepared to enter into the fray with the evidence, if they were not sure of their ground.
I can assure you that is very standard, your reaction is emotive crappage, its a union, they represent his interests, they are duty bound, and like all legal representation, will swear that black is white if it suits their clients agenda. They will be found out once the full case is reviewed...