Search results

Why?

If an appeal was granted he would still be guilty. What part of this basic understanding of the law are you struggling with?

He's guilty you fvckwit.

So in your mind, we should allow a convicted rapist to train with our team using our facilities in the slim hope he is first granted leave to appeal, then granted an appeal, then found innocent. And you think if we were to do this our principles would be of the highest order. Amazing, truly...

He IS guilty you senile old buffoon.

You are morally bankrupt.

And a rapist.

None I hope.

He is allowed to play again, there is nothing legal whatsoever stopping him from playing Professional Football.

You are Ched Evans, and I claim my £5 :lolol:

No I haven't seen that, but at least drew knows more about the case than the Jury did.

Pretty much the way I see it, it's incredible how much more you get to see as a Juror that doesn't get reported. And yet people on hre still seem to think they know enough to question the verdict.

He hasn't even been granted an appeal yet.

I think you'll find, that if he hadn't raped the girl in the first place then Ennis would not have been threatened, so it has got everything to do with him.

Why wouldn't he?

Fair point.

Put simply, in any other profession be it a builder or accountant, the company that employs the ex-convict is probably not expecting their customers, who will range from Pensioners to Children, to turn up and clap and cheer their staff.

This.

He won't get an appeal I think.

The other side said: "Guilty"