[Football] If Palace can't play in the Europa League

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊







kevo

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2008
10,304
Much as it pains me to say it, I'm sure Palace will do enough to finish at least lower-mid table (say, 12th!). Even with Europe to contend with, they have enough quality in the squad. However, as you say, if Glasner left (and maybe one or two stand-out players) then my view would change...
I think the fact they are playing in the Europa rather than the Conference will have an impact. If you are playing the minnows in the Conference League, you can afford to put out a second XI (with some first teamers on the bench), in which case it shouldn't affect your league form too much. But in the Europa, you really need to field your first team. That's at least six extra fixtures they'll have next season.

We saw ourselves how the extra fixtures/potential for injuries etc affected our form. After all, even Palace finished above us :)
 


Eeyore

Munching grass in Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
28,541
Mitoma could play in any team in the world !
There is not one player from palace that I would want
Well, Eze, maybe. In fact, more than maybe.
 


nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
19,247
Gods country fortnightly
I think the fact they are playing in the Europa rather than the Conference will have an impact. If you are playing the minnows in the Conference League, you can afford to put out a second XI (with some first teamers on the bench), in which case it shouldn't affect your league form too much. But in the Europa, you really need to field your first team. That's at least six extra fixtures they'll have next season.

We saw ourselves how the extra fixtures/potential for injuries etc affected our form. After all, even Palace finished above us :)
The good thing for us next season is half the PL are in Europe and some shouldn't be there. Hopefully we can capitalise
 


mile oak

Well-known member
May 21, 2023
1,359
Hopefully they can't if UEFA stick to their rules.

So the Europa League will be one team down. If the EPL need to provide another team I'd assume it would be Forest.

Then that means a Europa Conference spot available?

Straw grasping here
WHY wouldn't CP qualify for Europe?
 




eaglesdan

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
281
Of course there is bitterness and sour grapes, it’s how it should be, I would expect nothing less if the boot was on the other foot. But your cup win? Apart from Villa and City you had a piss easy run. You are, and should be, crowing about the win to us. But don’t delude yourselves. We had the most playing time lost to injuries in the Prem last season, but still finished in a good position earning £12million more than you guys (your cup win was worth about £3million by the way).

Next season we are looking to improve and have already got players signed in advance. We might lose a couple but our transfer kitty will be bolstered and our recruitment process is well proven. If you guys lose a couple like Wharton and Olise you will be in panic mode. And if Glasner goes……..
Sorry to correct you woody, but Olise left last summer, and won the German league with Bayern
 


eaglesdan

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
281
You're right, we are all a bit jealous.

BUT you definitely have lucked out a bit with winning the FA Cup.

Early rounds you had a very easy run but the games you highlight as showing how well you've done in beating Villa and Man City don't really add up. Villa was in the same week as their European game, they played mid week and were clearly knackered. LUCKY.

I hate watched the final and you were average at best. You sat in for the whole game and scored on the break. Your keeper should have been sent off. LUCKY. Man City are not what they were. LUCKY

Only credit I'll give you was winning at Fulham was a very good win.

The issue for me is that Palace fans are making out that winning the FA Cup shows how much they have progressed. Like Spurs winning the Europa, it clouds over the league position. You finished 12th (admittedly after a poor start), we finished 8th, despite a very poor spell in the middle. So we have progressed better, despite being in the Premier League less time than you. We have finished in the premier league more times in the top 10 than you. our progression is better. That's it.

Lucky luck lucky.

I hope it blows up in your faces next season and you get relegated.
But when we finished above you the previous season, league positions counted for nothing. Which is it? Do league positions matter or not? Or do they only matter when you finish higher?
 


eaglesdan

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
281
That is simply not true. The four horsemen of the crapocalypse do not own equal shares.

Textor owns more than 40% of Palace. They will try to argue that they meet the rules because he does not have majority CONTROL of the club (as Parrish retains control despite owning less) - but he is the largest shareholder.
OK I stand corrected, but if Textor owns less than 50% then he is not the majority shareholder. Again, I am prepared to be corrected, but I thought the rule was that the owner had to be the majority shareholder in more than 1 club, so no trying to argue our way out of it, simply abiding by the rules
 




Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
59,009
Back in Sussex
But when we finished above you the previous season, league positions counted for nothing. Which is it? Do league positions matter or not? Or do they only matter when you finish higher?
Who said league positions don't matter?

Everyone I know was considerably less than happy that you managed to scrape your lower-half arses above us in the final reckoning last season.

There were mitigating circumstances - terrible injuries, the burden of Thursday-Sunday football and Roberto De Zerbi giving up, but the table doesn't lie: over the course of the season you were better than us.

Normal service has resumed this season, and I fully expect it to be the same this time next year, whether UEFA allow you in - giving you that same Thursday-Sunday headache - or not.

We're simply a lot better than you right now.
 


eaglesdan

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
281
Who said league positions don't matter?

Everyone I know was considerably less than happy that you managed to scrape your lower-half arses above us in the final reckoning last season.

There were mitigating circumstances - terrible injuries, the burden of Thursday-Sunday football and Roberto De Zerbi giving up, but the table doesn't lie: over the course of the season you were better than us.

Normal service has resumed this season, and I fully expect it to be the same this time next year, whether UEFA allow you in - giving you that same Thursday-Sunday headache - or not.

We're simply a lot better than you right now.
A look at the respective trophy cabinets would suggest otherwise, but if you say so...
 


Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo

I believe in Joe Hendry
Oct 4, 2003
12,904
OK I stand corrected, but if Textor owns less than 50% then he is not the majority shareholder. Again, I am prepared to be corrected, but I thought the rule was that the owner had to be the majority shareholder in more than 1 club, so no trying to argue our way out of it, simply abiding by the rules
No. The UEFA multi club ownership rules are having more than 30% of shares in more than one club. Textor currently has 45% of shares in Palace and approx 78% of shares in Lyon.
 




PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
20,548
Hurst Green
No. The UEFA multi club ownership rules are having more than 30% of shares in more than one club. Textor currently has 45% of shares in Palace and approx 78% of shares in Lyon.
I love people who are prepared to argue when they have very little grasp of the situation. It really isn't hard to find the facts especially as anyone who posts on here would have access to a wealth of information from searching the web.
 


Pavilionaire

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
31,694
OK I stand corrected, but if Textor owns less than 50% then he is not the majority shareholder. Again, I am prepared to be corrected, but I thought the rule was that the owner had to be the majority shareholder in more than 1 club, so no trying to argue our way out of it, simply abiding by the rules
In a Premier League takeover, a shareholding of 25% or more in a club is considered control, according to Premier League and EFL regulations. US businessman John Textor's Eagle Football Group owns 45% of Crystal Palace and a controlling stake in Olympique Lyonnais.

So, Palace will be scrambling behind the scenes to make this happen. But it will surely take time, and there are already rumours of a fallout between Parish and Textor. To excel in the Europa League Palace will need to improve their squad, and so prospective players will want a guarantee that Palace ARE in Europe. Any lingering doubt could delay recruitment in, and also be a push factor for players leaving.

I read Finance expert Stefan Borson told Football Insider that Textor’s corporate activity plans could cause an issue if he decides to put either club into a blind trust.

“If he has indirect influence, and it is defined in Article 5 of the Uefa rules that it needs to be significant. It’s not just that you happen to be a shareholder, so you would have to have significant influence over certain aspects of Crystal Palace for this to bite.

“Then the issue is going to be around what his plans are. He seems to have a lot of corporate plans for Crystal Palace and for Eagle.

“He talks about how he’d like to take his stake up in Crystal Palace or he’d like to sell it completely, and how he wants to IPO in New York the whole Eagle Holdings business that sits above Lyon and Crystal Palace.

“Now, none of the teams that have done a blind trust deal, so City with Girona, Nottingham Forest with Olympiacos, and Manchester United with Nice, none of those situations have had the interested party also at the same time saying that he wants to do some corporate activity.

“Because to do corporate activity, he’s going to need the influence and control to remain. He can’t put it into a blind trust and then do the IPO because he’d end up changing what the proposition is for the investors.
 


Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
59,009
Back in Sussex
A look at the respective trophy cabinets would suggest otherwise, but if you say so...
So it's you that's saying league position counts for nothing? Gotcha.

Palace won a trophy this season, but Arsenal didn't. By your reckoning, Palace are the better side, it seems.
 




Cruise Control

New member
May 28, 2025
4
Absolutely hilarious a lot of you saying you are a much better side than us! Take off your Brighton rose tinted specs guys! Yes, you finished higher in the league than us but that's because we started awful in the first 8 games as we had sold key players and didnt have the replacements match ready + 7 of our players were knackered from Euros, Copa America and the Olympics! Once we got our best 11 out on the pitch we were the better side - 30 games and we out points scored you by 4 points overall. We also beat you twice, once with 9 men, 5-2 on aggregate, we've also won a major trophy this season, you didn't, and we didn't get hammered 7-0 by anyone! It's not even close!
 


drew

Drew
NSC Patron
Oct 3, 2006
24,441
Burgess Hill
I think the fact they are playing in the Europa rather than the Conference will have an impact. If you are playing the minnows in the Conference League, you can afford to put out a second XI (with some first teamers on the bench), in which case it shouldn't affect your league form too much. But in the Europa, you really need to field your first team. That's at least six extra fixtures they'll have next season.

We saw ourselves how the extra fixtures/potential for injuries etc affected our form. After all, even Palace finished above us :)
Isn't it a minimum of 8 fixtures before the knockout phase?
 


nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
19,247
Gods country fortnightly
No. The UEFA multi club ownership rules are having more than 30% of shares in more than one club. Textor currently has 45% of shares in Palace and approx 78% of shares in Lyon.
After getting favourable refereeing in the cup final, they now want favourable refereeing from UEFA

Seems they'll try and play the Parish card, ie say Textor has no say in running the club.

Grubby but they'll probably get away with it

 


PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
20,548
Hurst Green
After getting favourable refereeing in the cup final, they now want favourable refereeing from UEFA

Seems they'll try and play the Parish card, ie say Textor has no say in running the club.

Grubby but they'll probably get away with it

What is interesting is Textor's management of Lyon. Could their debt drag him down?
 






5Ways Gull

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2009
1,413
Bridport, Dorset
The last 2 outliers (e.g not one of the big 6) to win the cup have been Wigan in 2013 who were already relegated and have shown absolutely no sign of getting back to the top flight and Leicester in 2021, who were relegated end of the 22/23 season, came back for a season and were absolutely shocking. In both instances those cup wins feel like a distant memory. Think Leeds will make a good fist of it next season and I have a funny feeling Sunderland may be ok as well.

Palace need to keep hold of Eze and Glasner in particular along with likes of Guehi, Wharton, Munoz. Otherwise????

Could see Glasner, if he gets one of the big Europe club jobs, wanting to take some players with him.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top