- Jul 10, 2003
- 29,072
I wouldn't piss on either if they weere on fire so can't vote.
Johnson and the Mail have consistently been proven to be serial liars.
Why didn't the idiot who set up this poll give an option of neither![]()
as the source is Cummings, the question is do you believe and trust him.
as the source is Cummings, the question is do you believe and trust him.
I wouldn't piss on either if they were on fire so can't vote.
Johnson and the Mail have consistently been proven to be serial liars.
Given that both options have been proven to be serial truth benders I'll opt out.
I believe that BJ said it, or something very similar. Not the kind of thing you splash all over your front page - even if you're the Daily Mail - unless you can back it up (audio recording etc). Let's see BJ bluff and bluster his way through THIS one![]()
Yes. Always admired him. A man of integrity and honour doing what he believes is right for his country. An honest man misunderstood by many.
bottom line i wouldnt trust either Johnson, the Mail, or Cummings. but i dont think Johnson is nasty either. alternative is a deliberate misquote, cited by a disgruntled former employee.
Very VERY curious that it's being rightly massively reported everywhere - other than on the BBC? What GIVES?
View attachment 136157