[Politics] Brexit

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

If there was a second Brexit referendum how would you vote?


  • Total voters
    1,085








Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
23,999
Caption contest..


_110631427_leyenpa24jan20big.jpg
 


Jan 30, 2008
31,981
Well that's bound to happen now with Brexit and Johnson protecting worker's rights :shootself

I notice that not one Brexit supporter has any views whatsoever on the North Sea Border processes released and posted on here 8 hours ago. I would have thought that maybe one would be able to justify the reasons it appears to be the exact opposite to what Johnson has stated throughout. I'm a little surprised that NSC's most ardent unionist [MENTION=33253]JC Footy Genius[/MENTION] appears to have no views on it whatsoever.

Maybe 'ignoring it altogether' is the new 'need to think positive' :lolol:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsM_VmN6ytk :wave:
regards
DF
 


















Lever

Well-known member
Feb 6, 2019
5,392
The ones who haven't spent a significant proportion of the last three + years having a hissy fit unable to move on with their lives.. in other words, the vast majority of Remain voters.

What is having a 'hissy fit' (emotive language and extremely partisan) or being 'unable to move on in their lives' (a vague and hyperbolic metaphor) and how did you enumerate those apparently 'moving on' in order to claim the majority have done so?

You may think these questions are pedantic, but you weaponise words against those people on here who continue to challenge Brexit claims (as if it is somehow wrong or unacceptable to carry on being sceptical), so it seems quite a big claim.
 
Last edited:




pastafarian

Well-known member
Sep 4, 2011
11,902
Sussex
Unemployment at an all time low. This is how it's done.

Sack 3,000 managers. Employ 7000 workers on zero hours contracts at £9 an hour.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51223217

Except it doesnt say 7000 workers would be employed on zero hour contracts.
There is no mention of zero hour contracts.
How could you have read the article you posted and somehow not noticed this.

Pinocchio.JPG.f3dab9e576b5e13d8703e37bfd4a9d7f.JPG
 


pastafarian

Well-known member
Sep 4, 2011
11,902
Sussex
So just to summarise... if the Murdoch press is correct, we may be able to sign a deal with Japan by the end of the year which might be as good as the one we have anyway.

We may be able to sign a deal with Japan which might be as good as the one we have anyway or might even be better than the existing EU -Japan deal, as there is NO provision in the existing EU - Japan trade deal, or any other trade deal that forbids Japan (or anyone for that matter) from striking better trade deals with third countries above existing trade deals ( hint- this would be against the non discriminatory rules of MFN clauses -when contained in trade agreements- that have been agreed at WTO level)
 






Lever

Well-known member
Feb 6, 2019
5,392
"Shouldn't we be doing all this in a railway carriage?" (not my line)

In the UK, parliament scrutinises then votes to ratify withdrawal agreement then it's signed by the PM in the EU people who we can't vote out sign agreements ..

Thank you for taking the trouble to respond to my earlier enquiry; but please can you clarify....

What is having a 'hissy fit' (emotive language and extremely partisan) or being 'unable to move on in their lives' (a vague and hyperbolic metaphor) and how did you enumerate those apparently 'moving on' in order to claim the majority have done so?

You may think these questions are pedantic, but you weaponise words against those people on here who continue to challenge Brexit claims (as if it is somehow wrong or unacceptable to carry on being sceptical), so it seems quite a big claim.
 


pastafarian

Well-known member
Sep 4, 2011
11,902
Sussex
Thank you for taking the trouble to respond to my earlier enquiry; but please can you clarify....

What is having a 'hissy fit' (emotive language and extremely partisan) or being 'unable to move on in their lives' (a vague and hyperbolic metaphor) and how did you enumerate those apparently 'moving on' in order to claim the majority have done so?

You may think these questions are pedantic, but you weaponise words against those people on here who continue to challenge Brexit claims (as if it is somehow wrong or unacceptable to carry on being sceptical), so it seems quite a big claim.

Think he is talking about the tossers like you who didnt respect the outcome of the referendum and didnt accept that we should therefore Leave the EU as per the voting instruction, you know, the knobheads who thought it was a good idea to throw democracy in the dustbin and simply revoke the whole process and tell the electorate to #### off.
I dont believe he is referencing remainers who respected the vote and accepted the decision to Leave(which isnt you by the way) but none the less have concerns about how we actually Leave............, so no need to play the victim card.
 


ManOfSussex

We wunt be druv
Apr 11, 2016
14,778
Rape of Hastings, Sussex


ManOfSussex

We wunt be druv
Apr 11, 2016
14,778
Rape of Hastings, Sussex
Think he is talking about the tossers like you who didnt respect the outcome of the referendum and didnt accept that we should therefore Leave the EU as per the voting instruction, you know, the knobheads who thought it was a good idea to throw democracy in the dustbin and simply revoke the whole process and tell the electorate to #### off.
I dont believe he is referencing remainers who respected the vote and accepted the decision to Leave(which isnt you by the way) but none the less have concerns about how we actually Leave............, so no need to play the victim card.

pasta,

You went to public school
You're English
You're from the south of England
You're a Tory
You back Brexit
You wear red trousers
You're a known pervert

Who gives a **** what you think? :shrug:
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top