Fine your not alone many current politicians seem agree with you.
I'm disappointed that my taxes have gone on your education, as the money was clearly wasted.
Fine your not alone many current politicians seem agree with you.
I'm disappointed that my taxes have gone on your education, as the money was clearly wasted.
Try and put a point across, I could sit here and fire sniper bullets at you too.
If you have a view to add to the discussion give it a go have more confidence .......
Oh come on, why oh why do you have to bring racism into it, it is so boring and so irrelevant.
You have just said yourself you dont agree with health tourism but somehow you vainly veto yourself from the same charge.
I have vigorously offered a view, to me it seems quite reasonable, some may disagree.
You then do a snipey one liner that didn't really make sense especially in light of you admitting you agree to a point with my view.
You shouldn't be so prejudice against posters its unhealthy especially from a moderator, are you one ??
I might agree too with your view on PFI and or tax evasion, but this thread was not about that.
But again you probably think your a libertarian, but my friend tonight you come across as a slightly bitter prejudiced guy who unfairly branded another poster a racist.
Shameful really.
Big gully.....El Presidente can be summed up by the fact he has his internet name on the back of his Albion shirt at home games. Sad, so very, very sad. Grow up El Pred as they say on the street![]()
I have no interest in providing an opinion myself as any thread titled "my taxes pay for this" inevitably descends into this and there is no place for debate either for or against, only it would seem petulant name-calling (and when any hint of an actually point to be made has been exhausted, arguments about each other's spelling and/or grammar). For what it's worth Wayneflete, unfortunately if you have a different opinion to the right-wingers on NSC they very quickly tend to resort to furious insults and hysterical nationalist diatribe, as they seem unable to separate reasoned and intelligent discussion from a different viewpoint for particularly supporting the wrong they wish to right. Hence "if you can't cope with debate then don't post in this sort of thread" becomes "I am censoring you and instruct you not to post on any thread on NSC, ever". Similarly the (locked) thread about Craig Thomson the other day descended from a discussion about whether or not he should be fired to some people making some pretty shocking allegations that boiled down to "anyone thinking he shouldn't be locked up and/or executed is a paedo themselves".
Link to Daily Mail article ----> Self-righteous hysteria ----> Alternative view provided ----> Tirade of unnecessary abuse ----> Opinion presented as fact ----> Insult exchange ----> Argument over grammar ----> Locked thread. 17 pages.
Que sera sera.
http://www.mhpc.com/blog/health-tourism-it-problem
Quite an interesting article here about this subject suggesting that as has been pointed out already Health Tourism isn't really as a big a problem as some would make out. In fact compared to some other issues (which aren't allowed to be discussed on this thread) it could be seen as smoke and mirrors to deflect attention to what we should really be worried about.
http://gulfnews.com/news/world/uk/furore-over-health-service-misuse-1.833073
The cost of her treatment and the care for her five babies on a neonatal unit will be close to £200,000. As a Nigerian national she is not eligible to free treatment on the NHS, but it is highly unlikely she will ever pay back the money.
As it says here the lady in question was not eligible for treatment on the NHS but received the treatment anyway.
Could I ask how else the doctors and hospitals should have handled this case? I like the idea that the NHS will treat first and worry about payment later, but then I am a bleeding heart liberal who cares about people.
Given that little rant of yours, the topics discussed are clearly not relevant to you on a personal level. If you have children then 1. you will be upset, 2. IF you pay tax, especially at the higher rate, then once again you must not be happy. Can I borrow your curtains please as it seems when you open them, the birds are singing sweet songs as the sun rises in YOUR world
On a humane front I kinda understand why she is here, but the system should not of facilitated her preference to enter the UK
But I have tried to articulate that any amount of non British/Eu care, inevitably sucks out funding from the system.
We wont/can't continue to 'top up' the funding, so someone loses.
It would be fantastic if we could feed and care for the world, but we can't, I think we are skint.
The NHS has always prioritised and we do today more than ever, that's why in my view, this Nigerian lady had no right to access our NHS that now have less budget to deliver care to others.
Well thankyou for that spectacularly patronising aside, you stuck-up prick. How's life on your ivory tower, looking down at all us plebs? FWIW, my post wasn't a rant, I deliberately offered NO OPINION either way on this case. Here, let me point it out for you:Given that little rant of yours, the topics discussed are clearly not relevant to you on a personal level. If you have children then 1. you will be upset, 2. IF you pay tax, especially at the higher rate, then once again you must not be happy. Can I borrow your curtains please as it seems when you open them, the birds are singing sweet songs as the sun rises in YOUR world
http://www.mhpc.com/blog/health-tourism-it-problem
Quite an interesting article here about this subject suggesting that as has been pointed out already Health Tourism isn't really as a big a problem as some would make out. In fact compared to some other issues (which aren't allowed to be discussed on this thread) it could be seen as smoke and mirrors to deflect attention to what we should really be worried about.
http://gulfnews.com/news/world/uk/furore-over-health-service-misuse-1.833073
The cost of her treatment and the care for her five babies on a neonatal unit will be close to £200,000. As a Nigerian national she is not eligible to free treatment on the NHS, but it is highly unlikely she will ever pay back the money.
As it says here the lady in question was not eligible for treatment on the NHS but received the treatment anyway.
Could I ask how else the doctors and hospitals should have handled this case? I like the idea that the NHS will treat first and worry about payment later, but then I am a bleeding heart liberal who cares about people.
Who clearly tries to trap people in your wording of said situation, Your last comment was exactly the point I was making last night, our doctors/nurses/consultants, porters etc believe passionately in the service they provide 24 x 7. I would never condone sending the family home, that can be self efficient should her husband return, work and pay for their offspring, The appointment of immigration solicitors like Mr Dado suggests otherwise (Goodnight Citizen Smith)
Big gully.....El Presidente can be summed up by the fact he has his internet name on the back of his Albion shirt at home games. Sad, so very, very sad. Grow up El Pred as they say on the street![]()
Given that little rant of yours, the topics discussed are clearly not relevant to you on a personal level. If you have children then 1. you will be upset, 2. IF you pay tax, especially at the higher rate, then once again you must not be happy. Can I borrow your curtains please as it seems when you open them, the birds are singing sweet songs as the sun rises in YOUR world
Big gully.....El Presidente can be summed up by the fact he has his internet name on the back of his Albion shirt at home games. Sad, so very, very sad. Grow up El Pred as they say on the street![]()
That was your biggest 'Huff' and 'Puff' yet and of course it isn't a single case is it, even you must acknowledge that there are many thousands of similar 'health tourists' and why wouldnt there be when as you suggest it didnt break NHS rules.
Why would any mother risk her babies life by giving birth in Nigeria or other third world countries when as you have suggested/supported they can come over here and enjoy first class medical care at our expense.
Why should we as a tax payer be burdened with these added and unjustifiable costs whilst others that contribute will not receive treatment, medicines or the care to the extent they would otherwise.