Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] If Palace can't play in the Europa League



Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
17,057
Cumbria
I keep coming back to the fact that the bloke is the largest shareholder of the business. Regardless of how they say that works day to day it is inconceivable that the largest shareholder of a business does not have influence over the business.
He's also the one with the money. And that usually brings power in decision making.
 




ConfusedGloryHunter

He/him/his/that muppet
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2011
2,682
The NSC hive mind seems to be gradually shifting to believing they will be kicked out rather than just chuckling at the very notion. This is setting people up for a needlessly disappointing blow and some anger when a solution is fudged together. I say it is much better to stick with the earlier position and giggle at the Croydon Clown Collective but expect nothing better.
 




JBizzle

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2010
6,984
Seaford
The NSC hive mind seems to be gradually shifting to believing they will be kicked out rather than just chuckling at the very notion. This is setting people up for a needlessly disappointing blow and some anger when a solution is fudged together. I say it is much better to stick with the earlier position and giggle at the Croydon Clown Collective but expect nothing better.
Absolutely. It's a fun diversion, but there's no way in hell we're playing in Europe next season at the expense of our arch rivals because of an administrative oversight.

It would be far too funny.
 


kevo

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2008
10,414
The NSC hive mind seems to be gradually shifting to believing they will be kicked out rather than just chuckling at the very notion. This is setting people up for a needlessly disappointing blow and some anger when a solution is fudged together. I say it is much better to stick with the earlier position and giggle at the Croydon Clown Collective but expect nothing better.
My position on it has moved from about 90/10 that they will be allowed in, to about 60/40. That's mainly because of the Drogheda precedent - Uefa have proved they're not afraid to disqualify teams who break the rules. I still think Palace will squirm their way out of it, but it's highly amusing they're having to go through this.
 




Gazwag

5 millionth post poster
Mar 4, 2004
31,423
Bexhill-on-Sea
Companies House still shows Textor as holding 75% or more of Eagle Football Holding, (who still haven't filed accounts which were due 30 Jun, 24), who hold 75% or more in Eagle Holding Midco Ltd, who own 75% or more in CPFC 2010 Ltd

Edit: I have missed some steps wirh Palace midco and holdco and Eagle midcos etc
 
Last edited:




hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
63,456
Chandlers Ford
Companies House still shows Textor as holding 75% or more of Eagle Football Holding, (who still haven't filed accounts which were due 30 Jun, 24), who hold 75% or more in Eagle Holding Midco Ltd, who own 75% or more in CPFC 2010 Ltd
???
 




kevo

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2008
10,414
Reading Drogheda's statement after they lost their CAS appeal, it doesn't really bode well for Palace. I still think they'll be OK, but can understand why they are worried.

Lots of engagement with UEFA, 'constructive' dialogue, various proposals, and the 'support of the football world' all in the end counted for nothing:

"We had hoped and believed that the principles of fairness and common sense would prevail. After months of engagement, constructive dialogue, countless hours of legal preparation, and multiple proposals based on frameworks that have been accepted in the past, we have come up short. Despite genuine and vocal support across the football world, the ruling did not fall in our favour. We are heartbroken by the outcome."
 


schmunk

Well-used member
Jan 19, 2018
11,212
Mid mid mid Sussex
My position on it has moved from about 90/10 that they will be allowed in, to about 60/40. That's mainly because of the Drogheda precedent - Uefa have proved they're not afraid to disqualify teams who break the rules. I still think Palace will squirm their way out of it, but it's highly amusing they're having to go through this.
The Drogheda result only really serves to underline that the March deadline is to be applied so subsequent 'fixes' will not be accepted. It was very clear that they were in an MCO, with their majority owners also owning a large majority of another club.

Palace's argument is that they are not actually in a MCO, as Textor does not have sufficient control of Palace, however this is very much up for debate, largely because the EUFA rules are rather open to interpretation, and also because Textor's voting rights vary between different type of company motions. I imagine EUFA are going through the motions right now...
 


nevergoagain

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2005
1,908
nowhere near Burgess Hill
Companies House still shows Textor as holding 75% or more of Eagle Football Holding, (who still haven't filed accounts which were due 30 Jun, 24), who hold 75% or more in Eagle Holding Midco Ltd, who own 75% or more in CPFC 2010 Ltd
I see they had a strike off notice in May, assume that was for the confirmation statement delay given it was cancelled 4 days later
 






kevo

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2008
10,414
Palace fan thinks there should be a play-off to decide if they or Lyon should qualify, even though the rules are quite clear on that point. :D:D:D They really are dim.

1750165878477.png
 












Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo

I believe in Joe Hendry
Oct 4, 2003
13,034
Palace fan thinks there should be a play-off to decide if they or Lyon should qualify, even though the rules are quite clear on that point. :D:D:D They really are dim.

View attachment 204633
The rivers of tears coming out of South Norwood if this happened and they lost would be hilarious.
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here