Between you who thinks this will have no impact, and Farage who claims we have been sold down the river, lies the truth, one would imagine.
No, I'm just saying that whatever the government does in trying to bring about relations with the mainland that are good for everyone, the Tories will be waving their empirical flag in the hope of out Faraging the Reform Party.
Quite, these are a good move by the Government imo
No, no, no that can't be right. We held all the cards - all those German car firms wouldn't risk upsetting us as we're so lucrative to them, remember?
The same rule as we have for EU citizens visiting the UK but that we don't push them into the rest of the world queue. Courtesy I would call it but of course you have a totally different agenda and always after an excuse to post some more pointless emojis.Well that's sovereignty for you
The EU separate UK citizens to make sure we don't overstay the 90 day limit that we voted to put on ourselves
I've never been crictical of anyone who voted BREXIT, except maybe for the really dumb reasons, you know, bendy bananas and all that. I was a reluctant remainer.No, no, no that can't be right. We held all the cards - all those German car firms wouldn't risk upsetting us as we're so lucrative to them, remember?
I must admit, I'd be embarrassed to admit I voted for Brexit, but then I wasn't stupid enough to believe the bullshit in the first place. Imagine thinking all those posh Tory boy gimps were political titans worth listening to in the first place.
Ok, so given Trump is on Russia's side re Ukraine and NATO is hanging by a thread, what part of the security element of today's agreement lies in the spectrum between "no impact" and "sold down the river"? From the BBC:Between you who thinks this will have no impact, and Farage who claims we have been sold down the river, lies the truth, one would imagine.
However, there can never be 'time controls' in a history experiment, meaning anyone can claim anything about cause and effect.
Part of the reason I decided the 'humanities' was a mugs game where he who shouts loudest 'wins'.
For a country of our levels
90 days/6 months, it's the same premise but you're as always choosing to nit pick and post another emoji.Quite apart from the fact that you are totally wrong yet again, EU visitors can stay in the UK for up to 6 months as standard visitors
The real reason we operate as we do is to save money as E-gates are far cheaper to operate than actually employing passport/customs staff and that's all important since Brexit, Farage, Johnson, Truss and co have crashed the economy. Courtesy ?
Sounds good. 'No impact' and 'sold down the river' are two points on a triangle.
The Government should take on board NSC opinions before committing us imo!I don't know, maybe you're right. Maybe it is all about petty vindictiveness and not multi billion pound economies and complex trade negotiations
So why can we magically fix it now all of a sudden ? or are you just being your usual contrary odious self.I don't know, maybe you're right. Maybe it is all about petty vindictiveness and not multi billion pound economies and complex trade negotiations
Because it doesn’t cost the EU anything to push UK visitors through the rest of world posts. Why would they spend money addressing the issue for uk passports and e gates when we f***ed them off. it works in our favour as already mentioned it doesn’t for the EU.
Yes they should.
I get that you're wound up by his silly emojis, but regardless of that, his points are well made. You seem to be insisting it is all down to petty vindictiveness, when an alternative reality has been patiently explained to you by others.
