The Clamp
Well-known member
I think you’re spot on.I don't think they are genuinely interested.
I think you’re spot on.I don't think they are genuinely interested.
Indeed. Voting preferences and reasons should be personal.....and not up for scrutiny, justification nor analysis.I suspect most Reform voters don’t know why they support them let alone wonder why people support Labour.
They support them because the standard of living is killing people. No one can afford to buy a house , wages are shit and no one has got much money.I suspect most Reform voters don’t know why they support them let alone wonder why people support Labour.
They are, that is why no-one on this thread who votes for or supports Reform has had a crack and telling anyone whyIndeed. Voting preferences and reasons should be personal.....and not up for scrutiny, justification nor analysis.
I think I do understand what they are thinking, I also think they are wrong to place the blame where they do.It's Farage the person I dislike intensely. He's a sleaze and anyone who cosies up to Trump like he does is not to be trusted. I waded into this one as a response to a lot of people instantly smearing 4m+ people in this country as thick/racist, that for me fails to understand what people are thinking and why.
What has Farage done now?I see Mr flip flop is at it again...
I think I do understand what they are thinking, I also think they are wrong to place the blame where they do.
I know that in this day and age we have to pander to the snowflakes and we should be quite so rude or blunt when describing people so maybe we shouldn't call hem 'thick'. Other adjectives are available for those of a sensitive nature.
Or why the discussion seems to be either Reform or Labour. I think the majority of NSC voters didn't vote for either last year.It is quite amusing how two of the most ardent defenders of Farage and Reform on here either wouldn't vote for him or don't believe in discussing reasons for voting.
I do wonder why they constantly feel the need to speak on behalf of 'others'![]()
I wonder why they constantly feel the need to speak on behalf of 'others'
There is a lot of truth in this and the standard of living has been hugely eroded over the last 20 years. In 1999 I purchased a 2 bedroom terraced house for 55k with my partner and we both had entry level office jobs. We afforded holidays, few nights out a week and lived ok. Today that same job I had pays £10k more than 1999 and the house is now £300k. I don’t know even where I would start if I was coming into the market in 2025 and I think it’s a depressing outlook for our young which in itself is a national scandal.They support them because the standard of living is killing people. No one can afford to buy a house , wages are shit and no one has got much money.
Most importantly they vote for them because a cartel of billionaires who pay f*** all tax have persuaded them that the above isn't because said cartel has all the money and continues to get more. It is, in fact, because of a brown fella who gave away his life's savings to get on a lilo and cross the English channel.
Of course one has to reiterate here that they absolutely do not buy this bollocks because they are thick or racist.
And anyone pointing this out is woke, patronising and 'chewing on dungaree straps' (whatever that means).
Indeed. Voting preferences and reasons should be personal.....and not up for scrutiny, justification nor analysis.
It will depend upon the reason for the scrutiny.First part of that...well duh! Of course personal voting preferences are (by definition) personal!
Second part of that is just fundamentally stupid. You think nobody should ever be challenged or questioned on their politics? There should never be any political debate, discussions, examination of why we vote one way or another? Really? What kind of country do you think you live in ffs? This seems like a sentence written by someone that has never thought about anything very much.
More of the same certainly won't give any answers. But people are talking about high taxes for the super wealthy, taxing wealth not income, public ownership of utilities to stop you getting ripped off.There is a lot of truth in this and the standard of living has been hugely eroded over the last 20 years. In 1997 I purchased a 2 bedroom terraced house for 55k with my partner and we both had entry level office jobs. We afforded holidays, few nights out a week and lived ok. Today that same job I had pays £10k more than 1997 and the house is now £300k. I don’t know even where I would start if I was coming into the market in 2025 and I think it’s a depressing outlook for our young which in itself is a national scandal.
People are desperate and voting for anything that can shake up the system and deliver some change for their lives and the grifters of reform and brexit campaign prey on them for their own selfish interests and advancement.
The truth is this country is broken and peoples living standards are collateral damage in a political system that is self serving. Not sure any of them have the answers to the problems we are all facing but won’t knock people’s desperation for something better.
They support them because the standard of living is killing people. No one can afford to buy a house , wages are shit and no one has got much money.
Most importantly they vote for them because a cartel of billionaires who pay f*** all tax have persuaded them that the above isn't because said cartel has all the money and continues to get more. It is, in fact, because of a brown fella who gave away his life's savings to get on a lilo and cross the English channel.
Of course one has to reiterate here that they absolutely do not buy this bollocks because they are thick or racist.
And anyone pointing this out is woke, patronising and 'chewing on dungaree straps' (whatever that means).
I don't know anything about IR35, so can't comment on that, however I have read some of the replies on here that indicate scrapping it could lead to all sorts of evasive ruses - who ever would have thought Nigel would be in favour of schemes that had less control and could make the rich richer, without checks and balances!Search function is your friend as I'm frequently told. But as a gesture I've copied below. I also said I'd be happy to pay additional tax to fund if it went to the right areas. Not sure any of these would breach international law. I'll ask you the same question that Berty swerved. Which of the Reform policies do you agree with ?.
I'd never seen it before but at a very quick glance:
Deport foreign criminals - The current 1yr sentence level is ridiculous when you look at the state of our justice system and the paltry suspended sentences some get.
End Student dependency visas - Do many UK citizens take their whole family with them if they go and study abroad ?, it's just not needed.
Abolish IR35 rules - Took away so much from contractors. I know there will be many on here who disagree but this if you got caught in it you lost all the benefits of being a ltd company but received none of the employee benefits.
Sentencing review - Needs a major overhaul and to keep offenders off the streets.
Will need then to increase detention spaces by 10k - I'd suggest even that is too few
That's 5 and at first glance there look to be others that I'd agree with but would need to see more about them and then there are a lot of disagree with or are just unachievable.
If a policy is unworkable, unaffordable or illegal why wouldn't you pick holes in it??It will depend upon the reason for the scrutiny.
If it were out of interest and open mindedness then all is tickety-boo.
Whereas, and I'm not implying that might happen here, that the reason is to pick holes, belittle and tag such views under a casual umbrella then it might be different.
Because it's just my opinion. Like music, a film, or anything....what makes your opinion better than that of another?If a policy is unworkable, unaffordable or illegal why wouldn't you pick holes in it??