Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Lewis Dunk.







tigertim68

Well-known member
Sep 3, 2012
2,908
As we see a few seconds earlier...

View attachment 199594
...Dunk and Van Hecke are in line.

The Palace player gets a little bit of space on the left wing while Mateta makes a sprint in the middle. If the pass comes in this moment, Mateta is not offside, so Dunk needs to trace the run in case the pass comes.

From this moment until the ball finds Mateta six seconds later, Van Hecke does not take his eyes off the ball. He doesn't know what happens behind him (maybe partially because bad communication from Dunk/Bart?) and doesn't drop in a situation where he definitely should drop. Instead Van Hecke takes a step up to support Jack's pressure on the right side.

When Mateta runs into the space that Van Hecke leaves behind him, Dunk can't outsprint him on a 10m run. It results in a decent run-of-the-mill chance made to look "easy" or "cheap" through Matetas excellent run and finish.

The defenders are not on the same page and we can throw around the ball of blame. For me the main reason (apart from it being a very good attack from Palace) for the goal is Van Hecke not being aware of what Mateta & Dunk are up to. He gets a little bit ball watching, a short lapse in concentration. Shit happens, maybe especially after playing endless amounts of football this season like Van Hecke has.
Well at least JVH can have a weeks rest
 


peterward

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 11, 2009
13,052
He's approaching his mid 30's and has not looked after his body as well as other players who have played at a high level long into their 30's ( Ronaldo, Milner ,Bruno etc.)

Combined with our sharp rise in our level over the last few years, it shouldn't be a surprise that Dunk has declined below our requirement. The signs were there last season, and its been even worse this season.

Strong conversations between FH and LD will be needed at the end of the season. I imagine Dunk is professional enough to understand.
I couldn't disagree more.

Lewis Dunk may be on the other side of the professional hill, but many (not just your good self) write him off so easily and his incredible loyalty and service to the club.

If you take his playing ability first.... many players go in and out of form, especially after injury lay offs. Who could ever foresee Adam Webster (also written off) would come good again and be considered a first choice?

Dunk is a quality defender, not immune to mistakes or injury lay off form issues. He still has a place and is good enough for THIS squad even as we can all see he's moving towards the twilight.

And beyond the playing, Dunk is a leader, a strong influence and example to new and young players of which there are many, he's Mr Brighton and his contribution to all things non matchday and squad harmony is also a huge aspect of his importance.

Mateta scores a good goal and people really want to just bin off our Captain, Leader, Legend?
 




One Teddy Maybank

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 4, 2006
24,247
Worthing
I couldn't disagree more.

Lewis Dunk may be on the other side of the professional hill, but many (not just your good self) write him off so easily and his incredible loyalty and service to the club.

If you take his playing ability first.... many players go in and out of form, especially after injury lay offs. Who could ever foresee Adam Webster (also written off) would come good again and be considered a first choice?

Dunk is a quality defender, not immune to mistakes or injury lay off form issues. He still has a place and is good enough for THIS squad even as we can all see he's moving towards the twilight.

And beyond the playing, Dunk is a leader, a strong influence and example to new and young players of which there are many, he's Mr Brighton and his contribution to all things non matchday and squad harmony is also a huge aspect of his importance.

Mateta scores a good goal and people really want to just bin off our Captain, Leader, Legend?
I agree to a point.

Dunk has been a quality defender, and in many respects still is.

He has never been that good a communicator on the pitch, and that has been more evident this season, because Webster is, and because of our style we need communication along our back line for a lot of the game.

He actually seems better off the pitch leadership wise than on it from what I can see.

I do think Dunk has been hampered by the England call-up and largely missing pre-season, and just has never really caught up, then getting injured etc…

The Mateta goal is down to him, I’m afraid, even I could see what was happening in the ground, and by the time he reacted it was too late.

He will always be a legend in my eyes, but sadly even legends struggle at times.
 




PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
20,353
Hurst Green
We score 1 goal in 3 games and now we're debating if it was the goalie or central defender who ruined our week (unless it was the manager who failed to make the world perfect).
As someone who constantly tells us how much better you know every aspect of the game and indeed more so our game, many of us witnessed live how he basically stopped every f***ing attack in the last 10 minutes, please explain for us underlings?
 


Doc Lynam

Helping police with their enquiries
Jun 19, 2011
7,404
The one thing you can’t do with Dunk is turn defending into a foot race. It’s the one thing he’s never had, pace. Nearly all the CF in the prem have genuine pace and can maintain it with the ball. VH and Dunk both are not quick. The high line when we squeeze the midfield always leaves us open to the counter for a well organised attack. If we are going to continue with this tactic we need pace at the back. Or we adjust and don’t have such a high line.
If you let the action arrive to Dunk he’s brilliant, I just don’t think that’s the way FH is going to play or the way football is shifting too unless your forest.
For what it’s worth I feel more comfortable with Webster at the back, he’s just more mobile, he’s not a better player than Dunk but he’s quicker and good enough. Would expect a couple of young centre half’s to be purchased during the close season. Comparatively an easier position to fill then further up the pitch. Then we’re cooking with gas.
 


One Teddy Maybank

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 4, 2006
24,247
Worthing
The one thing you can’t do with Dunk is turn defending into a foot race. It’s the one thing he’s never had, pace. Nearly all the CF in the prem have genuine pace and can maintain it with the ball. VH and Dunk both are not quick. The high line when we squeeze the midfield always leaves us open to the counter for a well organised attack. If we are going to continue with this tactic we need pace at the back. Or we adjust and don’t have such a high line.
If you let the action arrive to Dunk he’s brilliant, I just don’t think that’s the way FH is going to play or the way football is shifting too unless your forest.
For what it’s worth I feel more comfortable with Webster at the back, he’s just more mobile, he’s not a better player than Dunk but he’s quicker and good enough. Would expect a couple of young centre half’s to be purchased during the close season. Comparatively an easier position to fill then further up the pitch. Then we’re cooking with gas.
Agree. It makes the Cashin purchase look a bit strange IMO.
 




BBassic

I changed this.
Jul 28, 2011
13,652
Ed Aarons thinks Dunky is running out of time, #4 on this list:


Not sure I fully agree that he's on the scraphead scrapheap just yet but I must admit doubts have crept in about whether he's going to break the all time appearances record. A few years ago I was absolutely certain but with 134 to go it feels unlikely now.
 
Last edited:


Uh_huh_him

Well-known member
Sep 28, 2011
14,000
Ed Aarons thinks Dunky is running out of time, #4 on this list:


Not sure I fully agree that he's on the scraphead scrapheap just yet but I must admit doubts have crept in about whether he's going to break the all time appearances record. A few years ago I was absolutely certain but with 134 to go it feels unlikely now.
Surprisingly positive comments from the Palace supporting twat
 














Stato

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2011
7,722
Whilst I don't completely buy into Aarons's dig at his form(written with barely hidden schadenfreude that Palace's pantomime baddy appears to be mortal), it's hard to argue that he's been at his best this season. For me, fitness has been a major part of this.

Its a tricky one for Hurzeler. One of the things discussed in Naylor's recent NYT analysis of our injury issues was the physical demands of playing his system. He expects players to outwork and outrun their opponents and it seems obvious that the older you get, the harder this will become. However, I'm of the view that our inconsistency this season has been seriously contributed to by the youth and inexperience of the majority of our squad. We've certainly lost points through naivety.

With the departure of Lallana and Gross last season and the injury absences of a substantial number of the senior players, leadership is starting to become a concern. More than one person said to me after the Palace games things like 'This lot just don't get it' and for the first time, I find myself wondering about who will be instilling the playing squad ethos to newly arrived youngsters.

It's a risk inherent in the business model. Chelsea's travails seem to have been in large part due to this leadership and identification with the club being absent. If the likes of Dunk, Welbeck, Veltman, Webster, Milner, March, Steele are going to struggle physically to meet Hurzeler's demands over a whole season, who is going to be setting the standards and expectations that Brighton players should be meeting? This is especially concerning if some will be joining with the expectation of our club being a stepping stone. The rumoured additional experienced head didn't seem to appear last summer and opportunities to draft in these type of players seem increasingly rare. Rarer still if they will be expected to meet the increased physical demands of Hurzeler's approach.

There's nothing wrong with expecting your players to outperform their opponents, but the limitations of this expectation shouldn't be solely physical. Adam Lallana struggled with fitness throughout his time with us, but his ability to come into a game and know what was needed, or how to increase the performance levels of those around him were commented on more than once by the likes of Klopp and Guardiola. Its a fine balance and we have to be wary of the physical demands of a system ruling out the use of players who have the intelligence and experience needed to control matches.
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
64,913
The Fatherland
Ed Aarons thinks Dunky is running out of time, #4 on this list:


Not sure I fully agree that he's on the scraphead scrapheap just yet but I must admit doubts have crept in about whether he's going to break the all time appearances record. A few years ago I was absolutely certain but with 134 to go it feels unlikely now.
He still has a place in the squad but we do need to be looking to upgrade this summer and address his successor.
 




Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
64,913
The Fatherland
“The defender has been instrumental in his boyhood club’s rise up the pyramid, which culminated in him leading them into the Europa League last season.”

Quite remarkable. I really do think this is a case of he has been brilliant for us, but we’re also been brilliant for him.
 






Sarisbury Seagull

Solly March Fan Club
NSC Patron
Nov 22, 2007
15,724
Sarisbury Green, Southampton
Starting to feel sorry for him now.
Said on the matchday thread, I really wish we didn’t have to play him as it’s making me sad watching him lumber around the pitch making mistake after mistake. He’s so far short of the level required now and the difference in our record with and without him this season is quite stark now.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here