Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Where is Moises going? (Chelsea - 14/08/2023)

Where is Moises going?


  • Total voters
    664






Affy

Silent Assassin
Aug 16, 2019
520
Sussex by the Sea
So now Brighton are left without a key player, with no funds coming in, a manager in frustration and a dressing room in confusion.

The word on the street is that Kudus isn't signing because Brighton won't include a transfer release clause. I knew the Caicedo stance would come back to bite Tony Bloom, just didn't realise karma would act so swiftly. Time to let Moises go for the £80m-£90m. Keeping him has no benefit to the club from this point forward.
Try here mate https://www.theshedend.com/
might get a better reception
 


The Rivet

Well-known member
Aug 9, 2011
4,524
So now Brighton are left without a key player, with no funds coming in, a manager in frustration and a dressing room in confusion.

The word on the street is that Kudus isn't signing because Brighton won't include a transfer release clause. I knew the Caicedo stance would come back to bite Tony Bloom, just didn't realise karma would act so swiftly. Time to let Moises go for the £80m-£90m. Keeping him has no benefit to the club from this point forward.
Bearing in mind you are probably that Chelsea fan that posted an obnoxiously vile post concerning T Blooms religion I have no idea why you are tolerated on this board. Banned soon, hopefully!
 


Not Andy Naylor

Well-known member
Dec 12, 2007
8,846
Seven Dials
Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't both Dunk and RDZ said in interviews that Caicedo has been affected by the Chelsea interest? So we know that much, at least. But otherwise we don't have any clue about the player's mindset.

And correct me even further, but I can't see any way in which Kudus is a Caicedo replacement or that his arrival or non-arrival affects a potential Caicedo move. He appears to be a completely different type of player and we can easily afford the transfer fee whether we sell MC or not. Any doubt would appear to be whether we want a player who is so evidently reluctant to sign for us.
 


upthealbion1970

bring on the trumpets....
NSC Patron
Jan 22, 2009
8,868
Woodingdean
So now Brighton are left without a key player, with no funds coming in, a manager in frustration and a dressing room in confusion.

The word on the street is that Kudus isn't signing because Brighton won't include a transfer release clause. I knew the Caicedo stance would come back to bite Tony Bloom, just didn't realise karma would act so swiftly. Time to let Moises go for the £80m-£90m. Keeping him has no benefit to the club from this point forward.
Still too long left until you’re back at school 😂😂😂
 




essbee1

Well-known member
Jun 25, 2014
4,299
So now Brighton are left without a key player, with no funds coming in, a manager in frustration and a dressing room in confusion.

The word on the street is that Kudus isn't signing because Brighton won't include a transfer release clause. I knew the Caicedo stance would come back to bite Tony Bloom, just didn't realise karma would act so swiftly. Time to let Moises go for the £80m-£90m. Keeping him has no benefit to the club from this point forward.
Yoos a joker.
 


Green Cross Code Man

Wunt be druv
Mar 30, 2006
19,994
Eastbourne
So now Brighton are left without a key player, with no funds coming in, a manager in frustration and a dressing room in confusion.

The word on the street is that Kudus isn't signing because Brighton won't include a transfer release clause. I knew the Caicedo stance would come back to bite Tony Bloom, just didn't realise karma would act so swiftly. Time to let Moises go for the £80m-£90m. Keeping him has no benefit to the club from this point forward.
Quoting yourself. The height of hubris.
 


sparkie

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
12,734
Hove
So now Brighton are left without a key player, with no funds coming in, a manager in frustration and a dressing room in confusion.

The word on the street is that Kudus isn't signing because Brighton won't include a transfer release clause. I knew the Caicedo stance would come back to bite Tony Bloom, just didn't realise karma would act so swiftly. Time to let Moises go for the £80m-£90m. Keeping him has no benefit to the club from this point forward.
Pretty much all of this ^ is nonsense. Lol.

Why is this fool tolerated ???

The reported price tag is £100million+ I think Naylor said.

I don't actually think Chelsea will pay it before Tony's "No Sale at all" deadline - which must be VERY imminent now.
 




The Rivet

Well-known member
Aug 9, 2011
4,524
So now Brighton are left without a key player, with no funds coming in, a manager in frustration and a dressing room in confusion.

The word on the street is that Kudus isn't signing because Brighton won't include a transfer release clause. I knew the Caicedo stance would come back to bite Tony Bloom, just didn't realise karma would act so swiftly. Time to let Moises go for the £80m-£90m. Keeping him has no benefit to the club from this point forward.
That racist post by ‘the Celery King’ referring to Tony as a ‘grubby little Jewish trader’..........................This was it wasn't it so everyone can see you here for what you are!
 


ozzygull

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2003
3,974
Reading
So now Brighton are left without a key player, with no funds coming in, a manager in frustration and a dressing room in confusion.

The word on the street is that Kudus isn't signing because Brighton won't include a transfer release clause. I knew the Caicedo stance would come back to bite Tony Bloom, just didn't realise karma would act so swiftly. Time to let Moises go for the £80m-£90m. Keeping him has no benefit to the club from this point forward.
Christ your back. We have signed many payers and will continue to do so. Caicedo is our player contracted for 5 years if we lose a couple of weeks but he plays the rest of the season then happy days. What we will not do is follow clubs of players we are trying to buy from and post lunatic theories and flood their twitter feed with hate and nonsense because it is *ucking mental

with Kudus you know no more then us, if he signs fine if he does not also fine. Again because we are not *ucking entitled w@nkers.

Tony Bloom took us from the arse end of league one to Europe, every year since he took over we progressed. He only does things to benefit Brighton and the local community. I am 100% sure he knows more about the situation with Caicedo better then you or any *uckwick theorist who posts on twitter or X
 


Zeus

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2022
467
One of my mates is a Liverpool fan and he said he’d have MC in a heartbeat up there (Fairly obvious).
His suggestion was an £80m with a loan back for the season which I actually found quite intriguing.

I said, personally, I’d let him go to Liverpool for £80m just to piss off chelsea which is why I don’t run a PL club.

But the idea of a lower transfer fee with a loan back option is interesting. I presume Chelsea haven’t offered this as they desperately need him for the coming season.
Why would anyone spend £80m on maybe one of the best five cdms in world football and then loan him out?
 






SeaGullBum

Active member
Aug 4, 2023
95
Think we're fast Approaching the "if you don't pony up £100m+ within the next week...fk off" type date now, surely.

3 weeks till the window shuts, Parent clubs of potential Moises replacements will try and fleece us knowing we're £100m+ richer which again will put us into more time negotiating.

I'd of told them to fk off already personally, they're happy spending £80-100m in £20m increments on unproven Brazilian youngsters, why not just put to the Caicedo deal? As someone pointed out, for such a "big target" they've hardly put out all the stops.

I'd argue Arsenal did more to get him in January.
 


essbee1

Well-known member
Jun 25, 2014
4,299
Think we're fast Approaching the "if you don't pony up £100m+ within the next week...fk off" type date now, surely.

3 weeks till the window shuts, Parent clubs of potential Moises replacements will try and fleece us knowing we're £100m+ richer which again will put us into more time negotiating.

I'd of told them to fk off already personally, they're happy spending £80-100m in £20m increments on unproven Brazilian youngsters, why not just put to the Caicedo deal? As someone pointed out, for such a "big target" they've hardly put out all the stops.

I'd argue Arsenal did more to get him in January.
I think that piece of dogsh*t Boehly wants to make a point. Good luck with that Toddshit.
 






SeaGullBum

Active member
Aug 4, 2023
95
This is going to come down to Chelsea banking on Moises going AWOL and refusing to play, they're hoping he does a Sanchez and Tross special the Cretinous scum.
 


HCxUK

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2014
862


A Guardian article posted around half an hour ago. But...

Has anything changed? Nothing has been agreed, just seems to be Chelsea briefing that they'd like to get a deal done by the weekend. It's really simple. Just pay up
 


South Stand Bonfire

Who lit that match then?
NSC Patron
Jan 24, 2009
2,256
Shoreham-a-la-mer
Did I just read vegetable head’s post correctly? So not only does he know the inner workings of every transfer dealings we may or may not be involved in, a Chelsea fan is actually lecturing us on how to keep our dressing room happy🤣🤣🤣
 






Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,434
Goldstone
So now Brighton are left without a key player, with no funds coming in, a manager in frustration and a dressing room in confusion.

The word on the street is that Kudus isn't signing because Brighton won't include a transfer release clause. I knew the Caicedo stance would come back to bite Tony Bloom, just didn't realise karma would act so swiftly. Time to let Moises go for the £80m-£90m. Keeping him has no benefit to the club from this point forward.
f*** off you plastic twat

Please ban this idiot
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here