So he should have been banned back when he pleaded guilty to a bunch of the charges. We all knew he was going to be banned, but to start it with 2 games to go is a farce.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Football] Ivan toney going to be in trouble - BANNED for 8 months to 17th Jan 2024
- Thread starter pornomagboy
- Start date
US Seagull
Well-known member
Taybha
Whalewhine
- Nov 11, 2009
- 11,395
Ridiculous to ban him for 8 months and totally disproportionate.
Mitrovich shoves a ref, violent conduct and gets 8 games, Toney who is clearly addicted to gambling and has a problem, is not helped but banned for 8 months?
It's total BS....... feel sorry for Toney and Brentford fans as we all want to see such talented players play.. .
Some form of gambling community service and a big fine wouldve been far more sensible, but FA and sensible don't go together do they.
Mitrovich shoves a ref, violent conduct and gets 8 games, Toney who is clearly addicted to gambling and has a problem, is not helped but banned for 8 months?
It's total BS....... feel sorry for Toney and Brentford fans as we all want to see such talented players play.. .
Some form of gambling community service and a big fine wouldve been far more sensible, but FA and sensible don't go together do they.
Last edited:
Hove Lagoonery
Well-known member
- Dec 16, 2008
- 1,039
Withdrawn.
Spot on.
Sorry that a twat posted an offensive reply to one of your posts on this thread (now deleted). You have one of the finest minds on NSC and I am delighted you take the time to engage
I should think so too. Well done for that, at least.
Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
Don’t disagree. It’s a shambles every which way.
studio150
Well-known member
Toney is lucky he wasn't playing with Peter Swan.
That's two god-botherers done for betting relatively recently. Stuzza was the other. Perhaps they see praying as the best bet for eternal life?
Originunknown
BINFEST'ING
Precisely, what a complete farce
Ah I missed it
Jesus, it must have been pretty offensiveYou have one of the finest minds on NSC and I am delighted you take the time to engage
It was nothing really.Ah I missed it
Jesus, it must have been pretty offensive
But that is hardly the point.
Hope you're enjoying.....everything.
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,309
He’d already pleaded guilty before he played and scored at the Amex for them. I know this is Albion hat on but…. Doesn’t seem fair….
Bizarre decision to ban him as of now…….leaving themselves wide open to criticism. Absolutely stinks.
dejavuatbtn
Well-known member
Ban should have started from the first game of next season - as said above, this would have been a life ban before football lost its senses.
Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
The game that is sponsored up to the eye balls by betting companies handing an 8 month ban to a young player addicted to betting.
In an enlightened time someone might go...'hang on a minute..."
GT49er
Well-known member
Fairest and most sensible option would have been to ban him for 19 games next season - one game against every other club, which in a normal year would be pretty much the first half of the season anyway.
People saying it seems excessive compared to other offences (Mitrovic for example) - I can understand their feelings, but Toney offended - what was it? - 260 odd times. A bit of totting up there, I reckon, reasonable enough.
People saying it seems excessive compared to other offences (Mitrovic for example) - I can understand their feelings, but Toney offended - what was it? - 260 odd times. A bit of totting up there, I reckon, reasonable enough.