I would imagine it’s agents doing their job and negotiating a higher wage at Liverpool for their client. That’s what they are paid to do.Translation: Agents prefer Chelsea as they are offering a higher wage.
I think (hope) that's badly worded. Actually about sell-on clauses, not 'ownership'.That's interesting. Espoli still own 5% of his rights.
Ffs this stinks of a Brighton leak to get the deal moving againSky Sports News stating no bid from Liverpool, but they have been in contact.
Ffs this stinks of a Brighton leak to get the deal moving again
Remember when this news first broke caicedos advisors were doubting the validity of the bid.....Don't you think his agent might be aware of Liverpool's bid?
Why would we need to leak anything?
Not that would be funny.So Moises might be at Stamford Bridge on Sunday…….in red.
You have a very low opinion of Bloom and Barber.Ffs this stinks of a Brighton leak to get the deal moving again
Cheers Geoff.Going to take a break now, getting ready to go to Brighton races, be back this evening to monitor further developments in the race to get Moises.
Tonights Fans Forum will be interesting.Going to take a break now, getting ready to go to Brighton races, be back this evening to monitor further developments in the race to get Moises.
Liverpool may not even need to outbid Chelsea. After last season's rapacious asset grabbing by Chelsea, perhaps TB is no keener to sell to Chelsea than the rest of us? Whatever, it'll still be a lot of money, a huge profit, and conclusive evidence that we won't stand in a player's way if he wants to move to a big club, one that is playing in European competitions.It ain't happening, they we're haggling £5m over Lavia, we'll end up getting 3-4 derisory bids from them as-well.
"outbid" Chelsea yet we've not received anything? It's to save face for losing out on Lavia, another We tried by John W henry.