I agree. Olise’s agent would know if there was a clause or not. He’s also probably got Fab on WhatsApp and has decided his client should have a move.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Football] Olise
- Thread starter saafend_seagull
- Start date
Farehamseagull
Solly March Fan Club
The Palace correspondent for The Athletic says that clause is no longer active which would be a shame if true!
And Fred.
Look at you … first name terms.
Biscuit Barrel
Well-known member
What sort of club would let one of their prize assets leave for £35M, when he is clearly worth more.
Hope Palace manage to get some add ons added to the deal.
Hope Palace manage to get some add ons added to the deal.
Mancgull
Well-known member
Reports that Chelsea have offered £4m more than his release clause in a bid to get him before City.
Yet they can't put a decent bid in for Moises.
Just shows their scattergun approach To recruitment hasn't stopped.
Looks like Palace will lose Olise as well as Zaha.
Yet they can't put a decent bid in for Moises.
Just shows their scattergun approach To recruitment hasn't stopped.
Looks like Palace will lose Olise as well as Zaha.
Parish is getting a kicking from a few on bbs, which is funny.
The Haha & Olise stories on the same day raising temperatures, I hope they don’t burn their town down again.
The Haha & Olise stories on the same day raising temperatures, I hope they don’t burn their town down again.
ConfusedGloryHunter
He/him/his/that muppet
- Jul 6, 2011
- 2,058
As a supporter of a top 6 team I take offence to this.
Lurchy
Well-known member
- Jul 2, 2014
- 2,372
Along with the news that their main target to replace them is Demari Gray.
They don’t like that news either…
Paranoid of laughing readers?, bbs have over the years drastically cut the time you get, two or three clicks in and you’re blocked for x days.
Are you a member? I was for a while, but they block you if you rarely log in.
What a sh1t forum, matching the hideous stadium. Most other fora allow unlimited viewing from guests.
Motogull
Todd Warrior
- Sep 16, 2005
- 9,952
You can get to fukk with that attitude.
Reports suggest he's given two fingers to Man City and wants the move to Chelsea.
Must be drinking similar water to Moises Caicedo.
Must be drinking similar water to Moises Caicedo.
Farehamseagull
Solly March Fan Club
Same as Lavia. It’s wierd. They must be paying them extortionate amounts, it’s the only logical explanation.
And London. Obviously.
9 year contract helps
Nobby Cybergoat
Well-known member
- Jul 19, 2021
- 7,266
This is what is making the difference. It's security for their entire career. There are loads of players who have had a bad injury which has ended their top level career. By accepting Chelsea's offer they are now totally insulated against this.
It doesn't mean they will be at Chelsea the whole time. The younger ones may accept loans, or if they do well they might be offered a similar package elsewhere. The package may be lower with the promise of more football somewhere else, but crucially they have the option of whether to accept that offer. Going to Chelsea puts the player in complete control of their career.
British Bulldog
The great escape
- Feb 6, 2006
- 10,905
In fairness to Moses why would'nt you go to Chelsea and get paid what is probably best part of £1m a month for the next 8/9 years? I'm not convinced it's in the best interest of a young footballer football wise as they've made it, but if the opportunity is there then you have to take it.
Johnny RoastBeef
These aren't the players you're looking for.
- Jan 11, 2016
- 3,160
But what does it mean for Chelsea, when the inevitable happens and some of these signings don't work out?
Hunger is a huge motivation and without that some players are liable to become complacent and lazy.
They're potentially going to have a changing room full of Winston Bogardes who they can't shift.
Their strategy is fundamentally flawed.
Almost as bad as a club that sets a release clause for the same amount as they paid for the player in the first place - therby ensuring little profit (Leeds & Adams).