Search results

Stranger things have happened.

I think he is saying that he's not prepared to fall for the 'there's no Plan B line' at the expense of over-ruling the officers. That's fair enough.

I actually thought he gave very well reasoned arguments as to why it should be refused. He also said that he could see it being passed when it comes back.

Quick, get down to the council now and pass these about. They could reverse the decision before they go home. :clap:

Yeah, right. This isn't an application for a stadium. It's an application for a commercial enterprise to support the stadium. We'll be back.

I think it's a positive result. It'll go back in with many of the issues addressed and fly through.

Councillor West is actually right. There is a danger of it setting a poor precedent. That said, they need to come back with solid reasons as to why it should be built. You can't just say 'sour taste' to turn it down, and you can't say 'oh, the stadium is there already' to approve it.

Poor Barrowdale looks like she is out of her depth. The Officer in the yellow cardigan is desperately trying to keep her cool.

Let's hope Bruno isn't speaking last.

Thank god we're still in the EU otherwise he might not have been there to say that :amex:

Wouldn't happen in...

Anyone called Hamilton :)

"I've got almost a sour taste in my mouth." Is that the best you can do. It's can't be subjective. Your decisions have to be objective. What a foolish councillor (Barrowdale)

Whoah! You can not see that part of Bennett's field from Stamner Park. You just can't. It's utter dross. All this stuff about National Park is rubbish. I agree with councillor Miller that if the officers suggest refusal, then councillors would have to have very good reasons to go against it...