Search results

.....or could be White to replace Dunk, if Dunk finally gets that big monry move to the likes of Spurs or Chelsea.

Does it matter? Southgate clearly doesn't fancy Dunk and appears to have no intention to include him in the team. It's not just the one person that has said White is England bound after all, is it. The only thing that might prejudice an England call up is Southgate's apparent preference for...

We don't have to offer him a choice; he's under contract. We didn't with Stephens. Apparently we are offering Murray a choice, but that is entirely different.

Except that whatever the Leeds chairman says to Dunk is irrelevant.

Are they using VAR tonight? Because if they are, the VAR isn't doing much of a job either.

Big club refereeing, innit.

Yes, agree with that - and it's worth remembering, as the BBC commentator just pointed out, that the player he's having a ding-dong battle with is Arsenal's one-time record signing French international and former golden boot winner Alexandre Lacazette!

22 year old CB in his first season at this level makes rare mistake - hold the front page!

:shrug:

Why? If he helps them get promoted they still can't keep him, That'll upset them, so that should make you happy. :shrug:

Let them buy Ake then.

Evxery bit as much as that - and more. This is where TB's gambling comes in, isn't it. We could sell him for £35M now - but we'd rather have him back playing for us for a season or two; if he finishes up fulfilling his promise and taking the PL by storm and joining Maguire at the heart of the...

He's not going to get much more playing for Brighton - and he's under contract. Sulking, or throwing his toys out of the pram, would harm his reputation and may make prospective big-time buyers start questioning the risk.

Newby, innit..........

I'm sure the poor lamb would be absolutely distraught, having to struggle by on a paltry £40K a week for a couple of years.

Not enough.

Well, yes it does - but the YEP's apparent idea that we cannot recall him because he's played X number of games is, IMHO, total bollox aimed at pleasing their readership. It's because he's played X number of games that we're happy the loan is a good one for him and us so we want him to stay to...

Presumably you'd already trawled - put the link in with your post and people won't need to ask. No apology for just politely posting 'link?' - it didn't warrant a grovelling 'please sir' request.

OK, have done (not very well informed speculation IMHO) but why so arsy about just putting up the link? It does at least suggest that we can recall him in January (re: previous discussions on this thread); don't think we will though.

Link?